Measurement And Decomposition Of Multidimensional Relative Poverty In Rural Areas From The Perspective Of Rural Revitalization

There is no end to poverty alleviation,which is an eternal challenge faced by governments,societies and many other entities.At present,China is in a critical stage of transition from absolute poverty governance to relative poverty governance.Poverty in China in the new period not only shows the difference and insufficiency of different people’s income,but also shows the deprivation of feasible abilities such as education and health,as well as the inequality of economic opportunities and social rights.Therefore,the current standard of measuring whether rural households are poor will no longer be applicable.In order to objectively identify poverty and accurately measure the poverty of individuals and families,it is urgent to develop poverty standards and targeting mechanisms that fit the national conditions in the new period.Therefore,multidimensional relative poverty has become a new standard to measure poverty in the new era due to its characteristics of identifying poverty types from multiple dimensions and clarifying poverty influencing factors.By constructing a multidimensional relative poverty measurement system and aiming at multidimensional relative poor farmers,the status quo of multidimensional relative poverty of farmers in different regions and multiple dimensions can be clarified,influencing factors can be analyzed,countermeasures can be found,and poverty alleviation work from the perspective of rural revitalization can be effectively carried out.This paper first defines related concepts,including poverty,feasible poverty,social rights poverty and multidimensional relative poverty.This paper combs out the poverty theory,from absolute poverty to relative poverty,and then to feasible capacity poverty theory and social rights poverty theory.Secondly,starting from the perspective of multi-dimension and difference of rural relative poverty and combining with the poverty theory of "feasible capacity-social rights" proposed by Sen,this paper proposes a multidimensional relative poverty measurement system with 2 frames,4 dimensions and10 indicators.Thirdly,according to the factor analysis method and systematic clustering method,24 provinces and cities were divided into three types of regions,and the incidence rate of one-dimensional poverty in each region,multidimensional relative poverty index and the contribution rate of each index to multidimensional relative poverty were obtained,and then the heterogeneity analysis of multidimensional relative poverty in each cluster region was carried out.The results are as follows: 1.The lack of social rights will maximize the possibility of rural residents falling into multidimensional relative poverty.2.24 From the highest to the lowest,the single dimensional relative poverty incidence of rural residents in provinces and cities was ranked as productive assets,education,durable goods,clean fuel,clean water,endowment insurance,collective land,per capita income,housing property rights,and medical insurance.It reflects that rural residents mostly lack the material tools needed for agricultural production,and the low level of education.3.The northeast,coastal and central and western regions are classified as severe,moderate and mild multidimensional relative poverty.4.Chinese rural residents multidimensional relative poverty situation is severe.5.The main influencing factors of multidimensional relative poverty are pension insurance and consumer durables in the framework of social rights,while the per capita income,collective land,education index in the framework of development ability,housing property rights and fuel index in the framework of social ability are not important influencing factors.Based on the above conclusions,targeted countermeasures are proposed here: 1.Poverty governance should not be limited to absolute income poverty governance,but should be carried out from multiple dimensions.2.Poverty management should not be limited to a certain region,and China’s poverty reduction program should gradually transition from campaign poverty reduction to regular poverty reduction.3.Poverty management should not be limited to universal policies,but also targeted proposals.4.Poverty management should not be limited to government power,but should be jointly managed by multiple subjects.