Research On The Evolution And Stability Strategy Of Enterprise Cooperative Innovation Under The Background Of Sino-US Trade Friction

Since the outbreak of Sino-US trade friction,the United States has imposed a technical blockade on China with obvious technological advantages.This measure seriously threatens the safety and stability of the industrial chain and supply chain of various industries in China.Under the background of internationalization of supply chain,enterprises must break through technological monopoly in order to develop for a long time.The Action Plan for Improving Enterprise’s Technological Innovation Capability(2022-2023)jointly formulated by the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Finance puts forward that "it is necessary to accelerate the gathering of innovative elements to enterprises and support enterprises to build new R&D institutions with universities and research institutes".How to further promote cooperative innovation among enterprises,universities and R&D institutions is the key to break through technological monopoly and improve the competitiveness of enterprises.The internal mechanism and implementation path of cooperative innovation under the background of Sino-US trade friction have also become practical problems to be solved urgently by Chinese academia and government.Therefore,in view of the phenomenon that enterprises ignore the long-term negative impact of American technology external monopoly because of the risk of innovation investment,this paper first constructs a double difference model,taking manufacturing enterprises as an example to explore the impact of Sino-US trade friction on cooperative innovation behavior of enterprises and its impact on heterogeneous enterprises.Secondly,according to the empirical research results,the evolutionary game model between technology demand enterprises,technology R&D subjects and the United States,which currently monopolizes the technology,is constructed,and the influencing factors of the three parties’ strategic choice and the conditions for forming active cooperative innovation behavior are analyzed.Through the above research,it is found that Sino-US trade friction will force enterprises to carry out cooperative innovation and increase the possibility of cooperative innovation;At the same time,the impact of Sino-US trade friction is different due to the different nature of enterprise ownership,and the reverse effect on private enterprises’ cooperative innovation is stronger.The cost of technology outsourcing and the income from R&D success have a threshold effect on the willingness of enterprises to invest,cooperate and innovate,and the expected income increase of R&D success has an inverted U-shaped influence on the main strategy of R&D;Technology itself will break the evolutionary stability of American restrictive strategy.The adoption of debt financing will slow down the formation of the evolution and stability strategy of positive cooperative innovation,while the adoption of equity financing can promote the formation of the evolution and stability strategy of positive cooperative innovation under the condition of profit-making;Only equity financing can inhibit the formation of passive cooperative innovation evolution and stability strategy.Therefore,it is suggested that the government encourage enterprises to play the main role and break through the barriers of cooperative innovation resources.Overall planning,overall arrangement of technology research and development,pilot test,achievement transformation,pilot test,production and other links in the process of cooperative innovation,fully release the role of various resources in cooperative innovation,and improve the efficiency of scientific and technological innovation.Improve the tolerance level of scientific research failure and give researchers multi-dimensional incentives.Form an innovative atmosphere in the whole society and build an inclusive innovative atmosphere.Encourage scientists to have the ability,courage,responsibility and selflessness to devote themselves to technical research.At the same time,we should also guide financial investment institutions to participate and improve the innovative ability of financial services.Improve the participation consciousness of financial institutions in scientific and technological innovation,give full play to the service level of scientific and technological innovation,and make due contributions for enterprises to break through technological monopoly.