Research On The Problems Of The Peer Review System

In recent years,the issue of academic evaluation has always been a hot topic of close attention from all walks of life.Whether it is the policy of academic evaluation or the exploration of the reform of academic evaluation practice,the purpose of giving priority to evaluation quality has become more and more prominent.The peer review system plays an important role in ensuring academic quality.However,in practice,the due value of the peer review system has not been fully exerted,and there is a problem of deviation between "ideal is very full" and "reality is very skinny".This kind of deviation is related to rational cognition and organizational practice behavior.,which is the starting point of this study.This research takes the peer review system as the research object,uses the order theory in the new institutional economics as the theoretical analysis tool,and combines the development reality of the peer review system and the problems existing in the development to construct a research framework.In terms of specific content arrangement,first of all,after introducing the origin and significance of the research topic,by reviewing the current research status of the peer review system at home and abroad,a clear understanding of the basic issues of the peer review system has been formed,and the research methods have been determined.,The basis and scope of the research.Secondly,a comprehensive overview of the peer review system and an inspection of the status quo are carried out,and order theory is introduced into the research.Analytical arguments.Thirdly,by focusing on the analysis of the existing problems of the peer review system,and further expounding the causes of the problems of the peer review system,among which the influence of cultural traditions,the anomie of academic ethics,and the problems existing in the system itself are the most critical.Finally,a series of optimization suggestions are put forward for the optimization of the peer review system,which fundamentally guarantees the fairness and justice of the design of the academic evaluation system.