Research On The Problems In Grassroots Market Supervision Work In Jinjiang District,chengdu City From The Perspective Of Digital Governance

With the in-depth advancement of the reform of governmental institution and reforms to streamline administration and delegate power,improve regulation,and upgrade services,market vitality became stronger,and the number of market entities has exploded.Especially since the outbreak of the covid-19 epidemic in2020,we had seen the emergence of a large number of new forms of business,and the digital level of market entities’ business models has continued to improve.More traditional supervision methods can no longer meet the requirements of economic and social development,and the mismatch between the two has caused a surge in regulatory pressure and accountability pressure.At the same time,our country has continued to advocate the regulatory direction of "response to requests,the law-abiding are let be" and developed new work requirements of in-process and ex post supervision.Economic and social development and guidance at the national level call for improvement and innovation in the grassroots market regulation.Based on the theoretical basis of holistic government,seamless government,and digital governance,this article uses literature research,case analysis,surveys and other methods to investigate and analyze the digital governance practices of market supervision departments in Jinjiang District from the perspective of digital governance.To research opportunities and challenges for grassroots market supervision work in terms of digital governance and the practice of grassroots market supervision departments in digital governance,so as to explore related issues of digital governance in grassroots market supervision work.Based on the need for market supervision departments to innovate supervision ways and the reference to other advanced regional work models,this article combines case analysis and survey information to deeply reflect the actual problems of the grassroots market supervision departments in the actual work from the perspective of digital governance,such as differences in the understanding of digital governance concepts,differences in the level of digital supervision of supervisory staff,low use of digital governance supervision tools,low applicability,lack of integration and linkage of digital governance supervision tools,lack of effective coordination and sharing of data and information,and the functions of digital governance supervision tools are different from actual needs,etc.It analyzes the causes of the problems and finally comes up with suggestions for improving the grassroots market supervision from the perspective of digital governance: the first point is to establish the concept of collaborative supervision and promote the construction of a multiple co-governance system;the second point is to strengthen the data sharing mechanism and optimize the construction of digital governance platforms;and the third point is Improve the system design and optimize the work procedures.