| Prosocial and antisocial behaviors in sport refer to individual actions within athletic activities that either assist others,leading to their benefit,or harm others,placing them in a disadvantageous position.Such behaviors in sport serve as catalysts in promoting unity,collaboration,respect for opponents,and adherence to rules among adolescent basketball players.They discourage on-field conflicts and verbal aggression,thereby nurturing sportsmanship and fostering the spirit of athletics in young individuals.In recent years,the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility(TPSR)model,designed with the objective of cultivating personal and social responsibility among students,has seen extensive utilization across various sports sectors in different countries and regions.This model holds significant value in enhancing students’ self-regulation of emotions,encouraging acceptance of others,instilling a sense of care and compassion,and improving interpersonal relations.This study aims to examine the impact of integrating the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility(TPSR)model into basketball training on the prosocial and antisocial behaviors of adolescent basketball athletes.The research methodologies adopted include literature review,questionnaire survey,instructional experimentation,interviews,and mathematical statistics.The experimental results indicate that:(1)Post-experiment,no statistically significant difference was found between the experimental and control groups in terms of personal responsibility(effort,self-direction).This could be related to the relatively high pre-experiment values in the athletes’ effort responsibility dimension,a passive learning style,and lack of independence.(2)Post-experiment,statistically significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups in terms of social responsibility(respect,adherence to class rules,helping others,and cooperative responsibility),with the experimental group scoring higher.(3)Post-experiment,statistically significant differences were noted between the experimental and control groups in terms of prosocial behavior in sports(towards teammates,opponents),with the experimental group showing higher values.(4)Post-experiment,no statistically significant difference was observed between the experimental and control groups in terms of antisocial behavior in sports(against teammates,opponents).This may be related to reduced match opportunities leading to a lack of practical opportunities for the teachers to intervene in antisocial behavior amongst the adolescent athletes.(5)Post-experiment,there was a more closely positive correlation between each dimension of social responsibility in the TPSR teaching model and prosocial behavior in sports,while there was a more closely negative correlation between each dimension of personal responsibility in the TPSR teaching model and antisocial behavior in sports.In conclusion:(1)The Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility(TPSR)model exerts a certain promoting effect on the development of personal responsibility behaviors and a significantly positive impact on the development of social responsibility behaviors in the adolescent basketball athletes of the experimental group.(2)The TPSR model offers a significantly positive influence on the development of prosocial behavior in sports among the experimental group’s adolescent basketball athletes.It also serves as an intervention for the development of antisocial behavior in sports.(3)The correlations between each dimension of personal and social responsibility in the TPSR model and each dimension of prosocial and antisocial behaviors in sports are predominantly aligned with prosocial behavior.Each dimension of social responsibility in the TPSR model,compared to the dimensions of personal responsibility,more effectively promotes prosocial behavior in sports.In contrast,the dimensions of personal responsibility in the TPSR model,compared to those of social responsibility,more effectively intervene in antisocial behavior in sports. |