The Agenda Construction Of Housing Policy For The Urban Poor

There are many paths for questions to enter the agenda.In addition to traditional perspectives such as political leadership,crisis events,protests,and media exposure,the judicial practice has increasingly become a trigger mechanism for social issues to enter the policy agenda.Taking the housing problem of the American urban poor in the 1970 s as a case,the study found that:(ⅰ)In the traditional perspective,the efforts of nondiscourse actors in individual factors have been ignored,but amplified in judicial practice.(ⅱ)Ill-structured public problems can trigger social convergence in real society and policy resonance in judicial practice.(ⅲ)In judicial practice,not all public issues can become policy issues,and illstructured issues may continue to revolve for a long period of time and return to the formal agenda after being promoted by external factors.(ⅳ)After judicial practice experiences the final trial,the ability to supervise issues before will be disturbed by the fuzzy stage of the problem.After the rise of policy science,scholars have studied how public policy affects the law from the perspective of the relationship between law and policy.There are corresponding studies on introducing policy into the legal process from the formulation,supervision,and adjudication of law,such as performance analysis,cost forecasting,regulatory issues,etc.Still,no researchers have explored in depth how practical problems under the legal operation mechanism enter the policy agenda and ultimately affect policy through judicial practice.Based on the "tool-feedback-narrative" analysis framework,this study traces the development trajectory of inclusionary housing policy in the United States,explores the innovation points of research,explores the change characteristics behind the events,and promotes the application of classical theory to real cases in the process of grasping the construction path of inclusionary housing policy.This study is divided into six parts.Part Ⅰ is an introduction,which describes the topic of the study.These include: identifying the issues to be studied as exploring the construction path for policy issues to enter the policy agenda;A brief review of the key findings of the policy agenda and inclusionary housing research;Explaining the ideas and framework of the study,and describing what is studied historically and dynamically.Part Ⅱ is the theoretical development of the housing policy agenda for the urban poor.The contents are core concepts,important theories,research framework,and case review.Part Ⅲ presents public problem identification and policy issues,divides the problem identification stage,and discusses the problem categories.Part Ⅳ examines the impact of external factors on long-term policy issues,presenting the sequence of events of case studies.Part V describes the dilemma of inclusionary housing policy in U.S.judicial practice and analyzes two types of deviations from the public interest.Part VI is a revelation for my country.Limited by objective conditions and subjective experience,the theoretical reverse engineering and data quantitative analysis of the constructed path cannot be carried out.Still,the exploration of the path comes from the historical and returns to the real,so the theoretical basis no longer becomes a technical solution,but becomes a part of the practical basis to be tested and implemented.