As a traditionally agricultural country,the stability of rural society has a bearing on the overall situation of socialist modernization in China,and without the modernization of agriculture and rural farmers,there is no way to talk about the modernization of the country.As the new path of Chinese-style modernization continues to widen,China is also opening flights to modernise rural governance."To revive the nation,the countryside must be revitalized." The rural revitalization strategy proposed by the Party and the State emphasizes a rural governance system that combines autonomy,moral governance and the rule of law under the leadership of the Party organization,and it even raises rural governance to an unprecedented new height.The modernization of rural governance is an inevitable requirement for the revitalization of the countryside,a sure way to solve the "three rural issues",and a key part of the modernization of national governance.The modernization of China’s rural governance is a modernization under the leadership of the Party,and the roots of the Communist Party of China lie in the people,so the modernization of rural governance must also be inseparable from the modernization of people.The key to the modernization of rural governance is the modernization of farmers.Whether farmers can play a subjective role is closely related to the level of modernization of rural governance,and farmers who lack subjectivity will not be able to shoulder the important task of modernising rural governance.Under the perspective of rural governance modernization,farmers’ subjectivity is the object of study,and systematic research is conducted from several aspects,including theoretical tracing,relationship analysis,practical evolution,current situation exploration,problem analysis and path exploration.In terms of theoretical analysis,governance theory provides a profound theoretical foundation for this paper,and Marx’s thought on human subjectivity provides ideological enlightenment for peasant subjectivity,on the basis of which the relationship between rural governance modernization and peasant subjectivity is identified as mutually reinforcing.In the practical evolution of history and reality,the growth patterns of peasant subjectivity in the modernization of rural governance since modern times are analysed both historically and in common,and useful historical insights are distilled by showing the characteristics of rural governance and the reality of peasant subjectivity at different stages.In this module,the three forms of peasant subjectivity are analysed using case studies,and the current state of peasant subjectivity in the political,economic and cultural aspects is analysed based on questionnaires and interview data.However,there is still a gap between the actual state of peasant subjectivity and the requirements of modernising rural governance,and peasant subjectivity has not yet been fully developed.The main reasons for the existing problems are that farmers’ awareness of innovation has not been fully awakened,farmers’ democratic participation has not been fully manifested,farmers’ economic income level has yet to be improved,and the main status of farmers’ organisations is unstable.Finally,in terms of path exploration,this paper attempts to propose measures to improve the development of farmers’ subjectivity under the perspective of rural governance modernization,and proposes constructive solutions for the enhancement of farmers’ subjectivity in the modernization of rural governance.In conclusion,along the logical line of theoretical exploration-practical statustheory guiding practice,under the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era,this paper combines the current policy guidelines of the Party and the state on rural governance,constructs farmers’ identities of creating subjects,participating The identity of farmers as subjects of creation,participation and benefit,while coordinating the relationship between the subjects of rural governance,effectively guaranteeing the exercise of farmers’ subjectivity and realizing the modernization of rural governance. |