Administrative Law Research On The Access System Of Out Of School Training Institutions

After school training has a broad market and training institutions have sprung up.However,with the rapid development of after-school training,its problems are becoming increasingly prominent.Under the background of "double reduction",the topic of regulation of after-school training institutions has received unprecedented attention.The market disorder of after-school training institutions stems from the imperfection of their access system.The low threshold of licensing and approval leads to a large number of low-quality training institutions entering the market,which brings great difficulty to the supervision work.Firstly,this paper analyzes the value and significance of out of school training institutions,including legitimacy and rationality.It should be clear that the off campus training industry is not an industry prohibited by law,and has its space for existence and positive role.The "one size fits all" approach obviously does not conform to the market law and educational needs,is also contrary to the legal basis,and is unfair to legally operated after-school training institutions.The off campus training industry should not and cannot disappear.Legal regulation is needed to solve the current industry chaos and make the after-school training industry on the right track.Secondly,by combing the relevant policies of the current governance of out of school training institutions,this paper summarizes the problems and experience,so as to lay a policy foundation for improving the access system of out of school training institutions.Policy combing is divided into two aspects: central policy and local policy.Firstly,it expounds the overall situation,and then selects representative policy documents for specific analysis to achieve targeted results.Through the text study of the current policy,we can have an in-depth understanding of the regulation ideas and ideas of out of school training institutions,so as to better put forward suggestions and countermeasures.Finally,the key regulation of the access system is to explore a more comprehensive regulation strategy from the two aspects of procedure and content.On the one hand,it studies the approval and registration procedures and competent departments,on the other hand,it selects important areas for specific regulation from the institutional setting standards.It puts forward the construction of new systems,such as "classified license system" and "after-school training insurance system",which is intended to promote the orderly development of after-school training industry from an innovative perspective.This part involves a number of related issues,such as whether off campus training institutions can be profitable,and how to distinguish between subject training and non subject training.It is necessary to clarify the relevant concepts,analyze the above problems from the perspective of law and practice,and explore the most appropriate regulation strategy.Taking the establishment of a broader education system and the construction of a learning society as the starting point,this paper takes the development of after-school training as an important content of the development of social education.It is intended to clarify the root causes of the problems and try to solve the problems,so as to change the public’s inherent negative ideas about the after-school training industry and play a positive role in promoting the standardized operation of the after-school training industry and the good development of China’s education.After school training has a broad market and training institutions have sprung up.However,with the rapid development of after-school training,its problems are becoming increasingly prominent.Under the background of "double reduction",the topic of regulation of after-school training institutions has received unprecedented attention.The market disorder of after-school training institutions stems from the imperfection of their access system.The low threshold of licensing and approval leads to a large number of low-quality training institutions entering the market,which brings great difficulty to the supervision work.