Research On The Criminal Law Regulation Of Internet Rumors In The Information Ag

We live in a modern and highly developed society.This is a society with rapid development of information.It is an era in which information and news can be disseminated and diffused instantaneously.With the rapid development and popularization of the Internet,the communication between people has become more frequent,and the contact with each other has become more intimate.The connection through network cables around the world has become a "global village",and the relationship between people has become closer and closer..However,the development of anything has two sides,and we need to look at it dialectically.While the development of Internet technology brings us convenience,it also brings some unfavorable and negative effects and effects to our lives.Among the negative problems that arise,it often happens that netizens use Internet tools to carry out rumor-type crimes,and even with the passage of time,this behavior has become more and more rampant,which has brought great harm to our society and has become a social An important obstacle to well-ordered and orderly development.In order to punish the increasingly rampant and worsening behavior of Internet rumortype criminal acts,the relevant provisions of the criminal law have stipulated strong regulatory methods and measures for such acts,in order to reduce the incidence of similar incidents through legal means.occurrence frequency.However,according to the current reality,the criminal law’s determination of this type of crime,as well as the boundaries between various charges,are not clear and clear.This has also led to the fact that even though the criminal law provides a large number of methods and measures to punish such crimes in its provisions,the effect of social governance is still unsatisfactory.This article of the author is to explore these problems existing in Internet-type rumor crimes,in order to analyze whether the behavior constitutes a crime,the definition of various crimes,and the problems involving helping criminals,so as to strengthen the understanding of crime.Knowledge and mastery of this type of crime.Chapter 1 introduces problems.The title of the first section is Internet rumor-making,analysis of rumor-spreading behavior,and criminal governance.First,the first purpose is the basic definition of Internet rumors.This part is based on the classification of Internet rumor crimes and the causes of Internet rumors.And the actual harm of Internet rumors is discussed,in order to allow readers to have a more intuitive understanding of Internet rumor-type crimes.The second purpose is titled Necessity of Criminal Governance of Internet Rumors and Rumors,and focuses on the defects and deficiencies of the existing civil remedies and administrative remedies in the regulation of such behaviors,so it can lead to an important topic: targeting the Internet It is very necessary to carry out criminal management of rumors and rumors.The second section describes the current situation of my country’s use of criminal laws to regulate Internet rumors,which leads to the introduction of the problem in the third section,that is,the difficulties and obstacles encountered in criminal law regulation for crimes of the type of Internet rumors in my country.The second chapter,from the perspective of Internet rumors and citizens’ freedom of speech,defines the scope between the two,and makes it clear that the criminal law must maintain a certain degree of restraint and modesty in regulating Internet rumors.The Constitution is the most fundamental law in our country.In the determination of behavior,the composition of crimes in the criminal law is an important factor to consider.However,the setting of the relevant rules of the criminal law must also conform to the principled provisions of the Constitution and cannot be separated from it.set by the constitution.To find a suitable balance between the two models.The third chapter,through the definition and analysis of the relevant concepts in the judicial interpretations of the "two high schools" on Internet rumors,further clarifies that the criminal law should adhere to a scientific and reasonable attitude and method when regulating Internet rumors.The crimes presented in the "Internet Defamation Interpretation" mainly include two types of Internet defamation crimes and Internet quarrels and provoking troubles.In the process of judicial practice identification and analysis,the identification standards of these two crimes are not clear enough.This chapter focuses on the analysis and discussion of these two crimes.The fourth chapter focuses on the rationality and scientificity of the series of problems that Internet service providers help to commit crimes.After thinking and summarizing,it will be found that the current legislative model is biased,and this operation reflects my country’s active participation in Deep-rooted thought patterns of sin.In response to this legislative model,we need to limit the use.We should set scientifically,clarify the rules,and review them as a whole.Only in this way can we effectively combat crimes and ensure the innovative development of Internet information technology.