| The "Guiding Opinions on Implementing the Power List System of Local Government Work Departments" issued by the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council regulates the administrative functions and powers of local government work departments at all levels.The power list system has become a new round of streamlining administration and delegating power.important grip.Since the emergence of public power,how to effectively restrict power has always been the focus of government management.Improving and perfecting the power list system is of great and far-reaching significance for regulating the exercise of administrative power and promoting the construction of a government ruled by law.This paper adopts conceptual analysis,empirical analysis,literature analysis and other methods,through searching and reading relevant literature,integrating theories of control power,administrative openness,limited government,and government by law,and conducts a more in-depth discussion on the issue of the list of powers;This paper comprehensively analyzes the different stages of practice and development of the list of powers system,synthesizes the drawbacks existing in the practice in various regions,and summarizes the theoretical and practical construction of the system as a whole;Procedures,supervision agencies and other aspects to put forward countermeasures and suggestions for the improvement of the system.The practice and exploration of the local government power list system in my country includes three stages: the budding stage,the comprehensive development stage and the achievement stage.The current power list system has the characteristics of deep system implementation,wide implementation scope and good implementation effect in practice.The current local government power list system mainly has the following problems: As far as the system itself is concerned,the legal system structure is not yet perfect,there is a lack of clear legal provisions to support,there is a lack of standardized and unified content standards,classification standards,and implementation mechanisms,and there is a lack of a complete institutional system.Construction;in terms of the subject of formulation,the subject is ambiguous and single,the subject of formulation and the subject of implementation are easily confused,and not unified with the subject of interpretation;in terms of formulation procedures,there is a lack of external democratic consultation and due process support,making it not long-term,and Timely and effective publicity has not been carried out,and clear,unified and detailed procedural regulations have not been formed;in addition,as far as the supervision mechanism is concerned,there are problems such as inconsistent supervision subjects,unclear supervision links,and unclear supervision effects.It is suggested to improve the local government power list system from the following aspects: first,for the system itself,it is necessary to clarify the legal basis for the implementation of the power list,improve the supporting system and formulate standards for the power list,and ensure the implementation of the system;It is necessary to promote the diversification of the formulation of the power list system,clarify the compilation and implementation subjects of the power list,and promote the unification of the power list maker and interpreter;furthermore,in terms of institutional procedures,the operation process of the power list should be improved.The external participation mechanism of the power list system should be improved,and the public mechanism of the power list system should be improved,and the list-making body should abide by due process;finally,in terms of improving the supervision mechanism of the system,the self-supervision within the local government administrative organs should be strengthened,and the power list system should be clarified in the whole chain supervision.Links,improve the supervision effect of the power list system,innovate the form of supervision,and enhance citizens’ awareness of democratic political participation. |