In recent years,the development of the internet economy has been getting better and better,with some online platforms such as Taobao,Meituan and Jingdong playing an increasingly important role in people’s clothing,food,housing and transport.In order to maintain their competitive advantage and expand the number of users on their platforms,some companies may abuse their dominant market position by using their dominant position as internet platform operators to implement "two-for-one" behaviour.Internet platform "two-for-one" behaviour refers to the dominant Internet platform requiring merchants to choose only their own platform or requiring merchants to choose between their own and other platforms rather than their competitors’ platforms through various explicit or implicit means.The "two-for-one" practices implemented by Internet platforms have caused many losses to operators and consumers within the platform and have disrupted the order of market competition.However,China’s Anti-Monopoly Law and other relevant legal systems do not adequately regulate the "two-for-one" behaviour of Internet platforms,especially in terms of market definition,determination of dominant market position and allocation of the burden of proof to the original defendant.In view of the above-mentioned problems of the Anti-monopoly Law,the writer,after reading and analyzing a lot of literature and relevant legal documents,has put forward some suggestions of his own,in the hope that these suggestions can provide some new ideas for better regulating the "two-for-one" behavior of Internet platforms. |