Ancient Poems Fengyuan Written By Riken Nakai

The Japanese Confucian Riken Nakai has fruitful research results in his life,and the essence is collected in books such as "Seven Classics Sculpture Title" and "Seven Classics Fengyuan",among which "Poetry Sculpture Title","Poetry Sculpture Title" and "Ancient Poem Fengyuan" are the main results of the study of Shuxuan’s "Poetry Classic".The book is a summary of the study of the Book of Poetry in his lifetime,and the interpretation and rebuttal of the questions raised by the Collected Poems are commendable in terms of academic claims,writing styles,and commentary,and have unique value in the study of the Book of Poetry in the Edo period.The book takes Zhu Xi’s"ShiJiZhuan" as a reference,learns Zhu Zixue without sticking to Chen Theory,and integrates it with well-read books,and presents the dual aspects of tradition and change,and there are many critical reflections on the scriptures.The method is to refute Zhu Shu article by article,involving the dialectic of the meaning of words,the meaning of the chapter,and the examination of famous objects.The content is rich,and it has formed its own commentary:group scripture commentary,reference to ancient books,detailed and meticulous examination,self-created judgment language,and more criticism in Zhu’s note.At the same time,in the process of interpreting Chinese classics,Lu Xuan not only took China’s "Poetry" as the reference object,but also inevitably influenced by the Japanese academic atmosphere and the current situation of the times,questioned the text from a new angle,and made the following poetic explorations:First,reorganizing the text and deleting the poems to the end,he questioned the authenticity of the existing "Book of Poetry"publications,believing that there were many changes through Han Confucianism,and Xuan Xuan believed that "Confucius deleted poems",but because the deleted version was lost,so he took the return to the original canon as the orientation,trying to restore the original appearance of Confucius’s deleted text,in "Ancient Poems Fengyuan" raised many objections and implemented its claims in the arrangement of texts.The second is to cover the chapters,interpret the poems in text,interpret the "Poem" from the perspective of textual studies,and attach importance to the word admonition,but at the same time,it also returns to the poetic style,based on the text,understands the beauty of poetry,shows a certain degree of literary comprehension,and reveals the literary characteristics of the "Book of Poetry" to a certain extent.Third,referring to the details before,come up with a new solution:it mainly involves the basic problems of the study of "poetry".It can be seen that in terms of the academic radiation and cultural influence of the Yuan Canon of the Book of Poetry and its important commentaries in Japan,the exegetical path of Zhu Xuan faithfully reflects the effective dissemination and profound influence of"ShiJiZhuan"in Japan.In view of the many distinctive characteristics and thinking habits that exist in the process of interpreting the "Poetry",we compare them with the existing research results of the "Book of Poetry" in China,and explore the correlation from the perspective of similarity.Judging from the comparison between "Ancient Poems Fengyuan"and Wang Bai,Lu Xuan was influenced by it,and in addition to directly quoting Wang Bai’s statements in the book,he also followed his views and reorganized the articles in order to rebuild the classic system.The "poetry" highlighted in "Ancient Poems Fengyuan" can be traced back to the sons of the pre-Qin dynasty.Among them,in terms of his practice of interpreting the "Poem",it is especially similar to Ouyang Xiu’s "The Original Meaning of the Poem",and the two have a common interpretive position and have made an important attempt to restore the original meaning of the "Book of Poetry".In the Qing Dynasty,the study of the Book of Poetry included the book "The Book of Poetry Fengyuan",and from the similarity of the titles,it was found that both scholars aimed at "seeking the original",so the"ShiJing Fengyuan" and "Ancient Poems Fengyuan" could be placed together.In terms of value,the book clearly embodies the middle to late Edo study of the Book of Songs.It complies with The Times,gets rid of the blind faith of Zhu "biography" in the early stage,and becomes the representative works of the diversified development of the period.At the same time,it also seeks the "original" of the text,so that "the Book of Songs"step by step out of political preaching,and into the field of literature.He is also a citizen thinking in the context of Japan’s national conditions.The extra-territorial vision and interpretation formed by him have opened up new ideas for the study of the Book of Songs and promoted the localization of the study of Poetry in Japan.While studying traditional Chinese classics as a model,he also selectively transforms Chinese culture from the perspective of others,based on the local academic trend of thought and social sentiment in Japan.His application of the Book of Songs breaks through national politics and religion,and emphasizes individual conduct cultivation and value realization in reality.More "the book of songs" creation,in the imitation of the expression of emotion,profound thoughts.However,there are still some shortcomings.Some of the dissertations show the paradox between pursuit and practice.Sometimes they are suspicious and overheated,and the transformation of the text lacks deep academic logic.The speculation rooted in the"custom of the present world" is inevitably influenced by Japanese culture and individual life content,which makes the interpretation of poetry inaccurate.