Comparative Observation On The Efficacy Of Warm Acupuncture And Biofeedback Electrical Stimulation In The Treatment Of Patients With Grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ Uterine Prolaps

Objective:The efficacy of two different methods of warm acupuncture and biofeedback electrostimulation in the treatment of I-II degree uterine prolapse was compared and observed,and a better and more effective method of treating I-II degree uterine prolapse was selected.Methods:Sixty patients with I-II degree uterine prolapse were randomly divided into a warm needle group and a biological group,with 30 cases in each group.Both groups asked patients to complete a 20-minute pelvic floor muscle exercise.Patients in the warm acupuncture group were treated with warm acupuncture,and patients in the biological group were treated with biofeedback electrical stimulation.Both groups of patients received 3 treatments per week,with 1 course of 10 treatments,each treating 1 course.The two groups of indicators before and after treatment(total TCM symptom score,POP-Q quantitative value,PFDI-20,PFIQ-7,total clinical symptom score)were compared,and the data were statistically analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy.Results:1.Comparison of total scores for TCM symptoms: Compared before and after treatment between the two groups,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).After treatment,the two groups were compared,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).2.POP-Q quantitative value: the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01)when comparing the C-point between the two groups before and after treatment,and no statistically significant difference between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups before and after treatment(P>0.05),and no statistically significant difference between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05).3.Comparison of PFDI-20: the difference between the two groups before and after treatment was significant(P<0.01),and the difference was statistically significant after treatment(P<0.05).4.PFIQ-7 comparison: the difference between the two groups before and after treatment was significant(P<0.01),and the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05).5.Comparison of total clinical symptom scores: the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01)before and after treatment between the two groups,and the difference was statistically significant after treatment(P<0.05).6.Comparison of clinical efficacy: the total effective rate of treatment in the warm needle group was 86.67%,and the total effective rate of treatment in the biological group was80%,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The efficacy of the two groups was compared,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion: Both warm acupuncture and biofeedback electrical stimulation can effectively improve I-II degree uterine prolapse;both therapies can reduce the total score of TCM symptoms,PFDI-20,PFIQ-7 and the total score of clinical symptoms;among them,warm acupuncture is better than biofeedback in reducing the total score of TCM symptoms,PFDI-20 score,total clinical symptom score and improving clinical efficacy;there is no difference between the two groups in improving the quantitative value of POP-Q,reducing the PFIQ-7 score,and the efficiency of treatment.