Based on the selection of speculative modal adverbs "probably" and "maybe",this article analyzes their syntactic and semantic features,finds out the corresponding Korean adverbs for analysis,and interprets Chinese from both syntactic and semantic aspects.The similarities and differences between Korean and Korean,and then according to the conclusions of the analysis,a questionnaire for Chinese language learners of Korean is compiled,and the errors generated by the students are analyzed,and relevant teaching suggestions are put forward.The author mainly conducts the research from the following five parts:The first part firstly summarizes the research status of speculative modal adverbs in Chinese and Korean languages,expounds the categories of Chinese and Korean speculative modal adverb expressions and related vocabulary research,and reveals their similarities and differences.Through the analysis,it points out the research achievements and deficiencies of the current speculative mood adverb expression.The second part analyzes the syntactic,semantic and pragmatic aspects of the speculative modal adverbs "probably" and "maybe" in the lexical category of modal adverbs.The third part analyzes the syntax,semantics and pragmatic aspects of Korean speculative adverbs,and compares them with Chinese "probably" and "maybe".The fourth part analyzes the questionnaire survey of Korean students.The main questions of the questionnaire are choosing words,filling in the blanks,completing dialogues,choosing the position of words,judging right and wrong,and analyzing the results of the questionnaire.Finally,according to the results of the survey,the types of errors of the students are analyzed,such as: Mistakes,misorders,etc.The fifth part is to analyze the causes of the errors and put forward corresponding teaching suggestions accordingly.It is hoped that this article can be helpful to the ontology research of the two languages,and it can help Chinese and Korean learners to further understand the differences between the two languages,improve the learning efficiency,and also improve the teaching efficiency of teachers. |