Climate change is a major global challenge facing human beings today.For this reason,my country has proposed the goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality,which not only shows the international community China’s determination to reduce carbon emissions,but also means that in the next period of time,“Carbon neutrality” has been transformed into a national strategy.The carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals put forward higher and stricter standards for carbon emission governance,and require the joint action of the whole society.As the micro-foundation of national governance,the grass-roots government is the key link in the realization of the goal.It is the responsibility of the carbon emission control action.It must be scientifically planned and actively explore the effective implementation path of carbon emission control.This paper takes the carbon emission control of H County in Hebei Province as the starting point,and comprehensively uses the literature research method,questionnaire survey method and interview method to investigate and study the carbon emission control of H County.There are four aspects: The objective basic level is mainly about problems such as a large industrial base,poor energy structure,and imperfect policies and systems;The government level is mainly about insufficient supervision,weak law enforcement teams,and insufficient punitive measures;The enterprise level is mainly about governance.Problems such as high cost,weak awareness of transformation and upgrading,and lack of independent innovation capabilities of enterprises,and the public level are mainly problems such as lack of low-carbon awareness,high cost of rights protection,and low participation.In response to the above problems,the game analysis method is used to explore the behavioral motives of different stakeholders in carbon emission governance.Based on this,combined with the actual situation,the carbon emission governance suggestions in H County are put forward from different perspectives: the government should optimize the industrial structure,optimize energy structure and improve relevant policies and systems;at the enterprise level,It is necessary to increase team building,supervision and punishment,scientific and technological innovation,transformation and upgrading,and investment in governance;At the public level,it is necessary to enhance public awareness of rights protection and low-carbon life,and reduce the cost of public rights protection And increase the amount of corporate compensation,forcing the public to practice low-carbon behavior. |