Results Comparison And Teaching Research Of Complements "finish", "cheng" And "good"

Results the complements "Wan","Cheng" and "Hao" are frequently used in Chinese expression and have rich meanings,which are important grammatical knowledge in Chinese as a second language teaching.But because they all have the same synonym of "completion",sometimes they can be replaced,sometimes they can't be replaced;when expressing the result of verb "completion",which complement should be chosen,whether it can be replaced by the other two,and whether the meaning is the same after replacement become the prominent problems of result complement "completion","completion" and "Hao" in "teaching" and "learning".In view of the above problems,this paper makes a comparative analysis of authoritative dictionaries and corpora from the semantic and pragmatic levels.Semantically,it makes a comparison from the perspectives of sense distribution and semantic features;pragmatically,it sums up the features from the perspectives of the scope of application,the object of use,the object of description,the object of collocation and the expression of emotion;summarizes the selection restrictions and replacement conditions;finally,it puts forward the Teaching Countermeasures of the result complement "complete","complete" and "good".The research will enrich the theoretical research results of the resultative complement of "perfect meaning" and provide reference for the teaching and learning of "perfect","complete" and "good" resultative complement of TCFL.This paper is divided into six parts.The first part elaborates the reason and significance of the topic selection;finds out the shortcomings of the existing research on the result complement "Wan","Cheng" and "Hao";introduces the research object,research method,corpus source and innovation.The second part,from the distribution of the meaning of the result complement "Wan","Cheng" and "Hao" in dictionaries,summarizes the differences of their basic meanings;through the semantic analysis of the three examples,summarizes their semantic characteristics and differences.The third part summarizes the pragmatic differences of the three complements from the differences in expressing objects and emotions.The fourth part,combined with the research results of the semantic and pragmatic differences of the result complement "Wan","Cheng" and "Hao" in the second and third parts,summarizes the selection restrictions and replacement conditions of the three in use.In the fifth part,the author analyzes the teaching status of the result complement "complete","complete" and "good",clarifies the key points of teaching,and finds out the weak points of teaching.At the same time,it puts forward more targeted teaching strategies by comprehensively using the semantic and pragmatic restrictions and substitution conditions in the fourth part.The sixth part is the research summary.Results the complements "Wan","Cheng" and "Hao" have the same synonym of "completion".However,in terms of semantics,there are differences in the emphasis and semantic features of sense items;in terms of pragmatics,there are also differences in the scope of application,the object of use,the object of collocation and the expression of emotion;based on the above differences,this paper summarizes the selection restrictions and replacement conditions of the three in use,and carries out targeted teaching research.The research conclusion provides reference for the theoretical research and teaching of the result complement "Wan","Cheng" and "Hao".