| Moral outrage is a positive moral emotion.It is the anger,disgust,anger and other emotions generated when an individual,as a third party whose interests are not affected,witness a moral violation event,and it is the inner motivation to stimulate the individual to make the third party’s justice.Moral emotion can promote the development of moral cognition.The research on the development characteristics of college students’ moral outrage along with grade can provide reference for college students’ moral education.This study explores the development of college students’ moral outrage and the influence of the third party’s justice behavior.Based on the current research of the basic concept of moral outrage,grade differences,influence factors,research paradigm and the third party is the basic concept of justice,the research paradigm of the college students,the third party justice behavior and moral outrage justice act against a third party.the overall research framework is put forward,including study one and study two.In the first study,the influence factors of college students’ moral outrage.To explore the development of the college students’ moral outrage grade differences and other factors,is divided into a and experimental research.Study a experimental study using the method of situational stories,172 college students from freshmen,sophomores,juniors and seniors in a provincial normal university were selected anonymously and randomly to explore the influence of grade and type of injustice on college students’ moral outrage.The results show that :(1)Grade affect college students’ moral outrage,which means that the moral outrage of college students develops with the increase of grade.(2)the injustice type can affect the moral outrage of college students.The moral outrage caused by procedural injustice is significantly higher than that caused by interactive injustice.(3)The interaction between grade and unfair type on college students’ moral outrage is significant.For a group of college students,the moral outrage caused by procedural injustice was significantly higher than that caused by interactive injustice.For the freshmen,the moral outrage caused by procedural inequity was significantly higher than that caused by interactive inequity;for the sophomores,juniors and seniors,there was no clear difference between procedural and interactive inequity.Study of related research using the questionnaire method,the article discusses college students observer justice sensitivity,empathy and the relationship between moral outrage.A total of 200 undergraduates from a provincial normal school were given the basic empathy scale,the observer justice sensitivity questionnaire and the situation story questionnaire,and 186 valid questionnaires,The results of correlation and regression analysis show that:(1)there is a significant positive correlation between justice sensitivity,empathy and moral outrage(2)the justice sensitivity and empathy of the observer were significant predictors of moral outrage.In the second study,the influence of the college students’ moral outrage justice act against a third party.Based on the first study,the moral outrage of college students develops with the growth of grade,and the degree of moral outrage caused by procedural injustice is higher than that caused by interactive injustice.So in second study,discuss the unfair situation cause college students to the impact of moral outrage justice act against a third party,adopt the way of convenience sampling anonymously in provincial normal university 80 seniors,the unfair situation,discussed the induce moral outrage and presence of price under the condition of college students’ justice act against a third party to make a choice.The results show that :(1)moral outrage can influence the third party’s impartial response of college students.Compared with the students who did not induce moral outrage,the students who induced moral outrage did more third-party justice and more third-party punishment.(2)The cost condition affects the third party fair behavior of college students.The third party impartial response of college students under the condition of paying the cost was marginally significant compared with the condition of no cost.(3)Under the condition of inducing college students’ moral outrage,whether there is any cost to influence college students to make a justice third party response;Under the condition that the moral outrage of college students is not induced,the third party justice behavior of college students will not be affected by the cost condition. |