| OBJECTIVE:Curling is a competitive sport with strong performance accuracy,which requires high static endurance,balance ability,stability and coordination ability,which requires curling athletes to have comprehensive physical ability.This study will explore the application of functional training based on FMS in cross curling athletes’ physical training,and study the influence of corrective physical training on the screening score,physical fitness and injury risk of curling athletes,so as to provide theoretical basis and practical experience for the application of FMS in curling events.METHODS:This study selected 20 cross event curling national team athletes in the small ball center of General Administration of sport of China,including 10 males and 10 females.Male and female players were randomly divided into male experimental group(n = 5),male control group(n = 5),female experimental group(n = 5)and female control group(n = 5).Functional movement test,physical fitness test and injury risk investigation were conducted in the experimental group and the control group respectively.According to the test results,the experimental group developed a corrective physical training plan based on the coordination,stability,body proprioception and special characteristics of the project,while the control group was given the traditional physical training plan.In this study,12 weeks of training intervention,three times a week,120 minutes each time.After 12 weeks of intervention,functional movement test,physical fitness test and injury risk investigation and assessment were conducted in the experimental group and the control group.RESULT:In terms of FMS score:Compared with before the intervention,the scores of squat and hurdle in male and female experimental group and control group were significantly improved(P < 0.05),but there was no significant difference between male and female experimental group and control group after intervention(P > 0.05);the scores of left and right sides of male experimental group and control group were significantly improved(P < 0.05),but there was no significant difference between them after intervention(P > 0.05))Compared with before the intervention,the left and right sides of the female experimental group were significantly improved(P < 0.05),while only the right side of the female control group was significantly improved(P < 0.05),and there was no significant difference between the two groups after the intervention(P > 0.05);the shoulder joint flexibility and straight leg active lifting in the experimental group and the control group were improved compared with those before the intervention(P > 0.05),and there was no significant difference between the two groups after the intervention(P > 0.05);Compared with before intervention,the scores of male experimental group and control group were improved(P < 0.05),and there was no difference before and after the intervention(P > 0.05),and there was no difference between the two groups after intervention(P > 0.05);compared with before intervention,the scores of female experimental group and control group were improved(P < 0.05),and there was no difference between them after intervention(P > 0.05)The scores of the experimental group and the control group were improved(P < 0.05).Only the left side of the experimental group increased significantly before and after the intervention(P < 0.05),but there was no difference between theleft and right sides after the intervention(P > 0.05);Physical fitness:Lower limb strength: the maximum squat strength of male and female experimental group and control group was significantly increased compared with that before intervention(P < 0.05),and the maximum squat strength of control group was greater than that of experimental group after intervention(P < 0.05).The results showed that standing long jump had no change compared with before intervention(P > 0.05);upper limb strength: compared with before the intervention,the maximum horizontal push of male and female experimental group and control group were significantly improved(P < 0.05),but there was no difference between the two groups after intervention(P > 0.05);there was no change in pull-up compared with before intervention(P >0.05).Compared with before the intervention,the female and male experimental groups had no change(P > 0.05),while the control group was significantly improved(P < 0.05),but there was no difference between the two groups(P > 0.05);trunk strength and balance: compared with before the intervention,the male and female experimental group and the control group were significantly improved(P < 0.05),and after the intervention,the experimental group had a longer time to close eyes than the control group(P < 0.05)Compared with that before the intervention,the male of the two groups increased(P < 0.05),and the experimental group lasted longer than the control group after intervention(P < 0.05).There was no difference between the two groups(P >0.05).After the intervention,the experimental group was better than the control group(P < 0.05);compared with the control group,the eight grade abdominal bridge was improved in the male experimental group(P < 0.05),but there was no difference in the control group(P > 0.05).After the intervention,the experimental group was longer than the control group(P < 0.05).Compared with that before the intervention,the female experimental group increased(P < 0.05),but there was no difference in the control group(P > 0.05).After the intervention,the experimental group lasted longer(P < 0.05).Sports injury:Compared with before intervention,the injury probability of shoulder joint,knee joint,lower back,hip joint,chest,wrist joint,thigh,upper arm and foot of male experimental group and control group decreased after intervention,but the injury probability of experimental group decreased more.Compared with before intervention,the injury probability of shoulder joint,knee joint,lower back,hip joint,chest,wrist joint,thigh,upper arm and foot of female experimental group and control group decreased after intervention,but the injury probability of experimental group decreased more.CONCLUSION:(1)The scores of shoulder joint flexibility test,straight leg active lifting test and body control push up test of cross event curling athletes were higher,while the scores of deep squat test,hurdle step test,straight bow squat test and rotation stability test were average.(2)Both the corrective physical training and the traditional physical training can effectively improve the performance of male and female curling athletes in squat,hurdle test,straight-line lunge squat test and rotation stability test.But corrective physical training can better improve the straight-line lunge test and thematic stability test,while the traditional physical training can better improve the hurdle test and shoulder joint flexibility test results.The traditional physical trainingcan better improve the stability and flexibility of the upper and lower limbs of athletes,and the corrective physical training can better improve the stability and flexibility of the trunk.(3)The traditional physical fitness can improve the strength of the upper and lower limbs of the cross event curling athletes,while the corrective physical training can better improve the strength and balance ability of the trunk muscle group of the cross event curling athletes.(4)Corrective physical training can better reduce the male and female athletes shoulder joint,knee joint,lower back,hip joint,chest,wrist joint,thigh,upper arm,foot sports injury probability. |