Research On Administrative Accountability In Public Health Emergencies

Administrative accountability is the most important part of our country’s national governance and government governance.It is the basic policy of supervision and restriction of public power.It plays an important role in building our country’s responsible government and promoting the construction of political civilization.After the "SARS" incident in 2003,administrative accountability formally came into everyone’s field of vision,arousing widespread heated discussions among party and government agencies,scholars and the public.So far,China has achieved great results in the development of administrative accountability and system construction.A number of administrative accountability-related laws and regulations have been promulgated,accountability subject have gradually become diversified,accountability content has gradually expanded,and accountability procedures have gradually improved.The construction of the administrative accountability system is gradually improving.However,China still has many shortcomings in the practice of administrative accountability,such as a single accountability subject,difficulty in identifying responsibilities,etc.,especially in the process of responding to public emergencies.There are still many problems.The solution of the problem is directly related to whether administrative accountability can play its role in restricting and supervising power.It is the key to whether China can effectively respond to public emergencies and build a responsible government.Based on this,this article collects public health emergencies disclosed on the Internet-cases of administrative accountability in the COVID—19,statistically analyzes the characteristics of administrative accountability,and summarizes and analyzes the problems of administrative accountability in public health emergencies.Explore the reasons for the existing problems of administrative accountability and propose countermeasures to solve the problem of administrative accountability in public health emergencies in our country.First of all,the author deconstructed the elements of China’s administrative accountability normative documents,including administrative accountability subject,accountability object,accountability procedure,accountability cause,accountability result,etc.,and sorted out the development of China’s administrative accountability system Secondly,the 216 accountability cases collected through statistical analysis,summarized the characteristics of administrative accountability in the prevention and control of the COVID—19.In this public health emergency,the administrative accountability was mainly manifested as the Disciplinary Inspection Commission.The administrative accountability of the trigger mechanism is mainly based on the same type of accountability.The accountability targets are mostly grass-roots officials.The main reasons for accountability are ineffective epidemic prevention.The accountability results are more serious.In the collected cases,the accountability procedures are not consistent.It has not been made public.In addition,the author also found that the more severe the epidemic situation,the greater the number of accountability initiatives.By comparing the supposed normative administrative accountability with the actual characteristics of administrative accountability,the author finds that there are many problems in administrative accountability under public health emergencies in my country,such as insufficient legal basis,single accountability subject,and fuzzy definition of responsibility.The procedures lack openness and transparency,the accountability reasons are too abstract,and the accountability results are not standardized.The author analyzes the causes of these problems from both the subject and the object,and finally proposes solutions to the problems from the dimensions of the various elements of administrative accountability.At the institutional level,the legal system of the accountability system is improved,and a unified,nationwide legal system is established.Administrative Accountability Law,formulating special regulations in the field of public health emergencies;in terms of accountability subjects,strengthen allogeneic accountability,strengthen multiple accountability subjects,and give full play to the role of the people’s congress,the media,and the public as accountability subjects;Regarding the object of responsibility,clarify the list of responsibilities between principals and deputies,and clarify the forms of individual and collective responsibilities;in terms of accountability procedures,establish an open and transparent mechanism to improve the relief and return of officials;in addition,the scope of accountability should be clarified and accountability The reasons are specific;the results of accountability shall be standardized,and the evaluation mechanism of accountability results shall be established to improve the scientific nature of the results of administrative accountability.