Research On The Dilemma And Countermeasures Of New Rural Sages Talents Participating In Rural Governance

The fourteenth five year plan proposes to start a new journey of building a socialist modern country in an all-round way,which requires promoting the modernization process of national governance system and governance capacity.From the perspective of modernization,we should look at the community of social governance from the perspective of modernization,Rural Revitalization from the perspective of diversification,and rural governance from the perspective of good governance.The Strategic Plan for Rural Revitalization(2018-2022)mentions the need to tap local cultural talents,carry forward excellent traditional culture,and give full play to the moral governance role of new rural sages in rural governance.As a result,the government and academia pay great attention to the participation of new rural sages in rural governance,form governance models that adapt measures to local conditions,and given full play to the advantages of new rural sages in politics,economy,culture,society,ecology and other aspects.It provides a new way to solve the problems of rural governance.It can be inferred that new rural sages play a vital role in the process of rural revitalization and governance modernization.This article uses the methods of literature research,comparative analysis,case analysis,historical analysis and other research methods to explore the participation of new rural sages in rural governance,and summarizes the Chinese literature in this field with the help of CiteSpace literature carding tool,and predicts the research trend and direction in the future.Under the guidance of polycentric governance theory and good governance theory,this paper makes a comparative analysis of the difference between new rural sages and traditional rural sages,and defines the mission and responsibilities of new rural sages in the new era.Through the comparative analysis of the classic cases of new rural sages participating in rural governance in Liangzhai of Jiangsu,Shangyu of Zhejiang and Yunfu of Guangdong,it is found that the mode of new rural sages participating in rural governance needs to be determined according to the local actual situation,and cannot be generalized.At the same time,it also exposed the defects of the main body of participation,the weakening of participation atmosphere,the lack of participation motivation and the lack of participation mechanism in the process of governance,which seriously restricted the role of new rural sages.The reason is that the thinking mode of pluralistic co-governance has not yet been established,the imbalance between urban and rural development,the lack of systems and policies,the imperfect rural governance system,and so on.this needs to start with strengthening the self-construction of new rural sages,improving the grass-roots governance environment,promoting the return of new rural sages abroad,and promoting the modernization of grass-roots governance.It is necessary to make clear the role orientation of new rural sages and improve their comprehensive ability,carry forward new rural sages culture and speed up the integration of urban and rural areas,and the government should strengthen policy guidance,financial support,and increase the platform,broaden the channels,especially emphasize the innovation of the"block chain+grid+new rural sages" governance model and the grass-roots governance system of "autonomy,rule of law,rule of virtue+scientific and technological support+party building".Generally speaking,new rural sages’ participation in rural governance as a new subject is a beneficial exploration of the future rural governance model,which is conducive to improving the level of democratic autonomy at the grass-roots level,optimizing the industrial economic structure,carrying forward the excellent Chinese traditional culture,and maintaining the stability of rural society promoting the construction of ecological civilization has not only deepened the polycentric governance pattern of co-construction,co-governance and sharing,but also accelerated the modernization process of the social governance community.