| In recent years,the orderly withdrawal of homesteads has been the direction and focus of the reform of the homestead system.Therefore,the central government selected 15 pilots out of 33 pilots of the reform of the land system as test fields for the reform of the residential land withdrawal system.Based on the experience and lessons of the reform pilots in each region,the roads that can be applied nationwide can be promoted,and the experience of this pilot can be upgraded to law.For example,granting the right to punish homesteads in rural areas.Of course,each place has its own characteristics for the main body and method of disposing of the homestead,the recipient after the homestead exits,and the guarantee after the exit.Regardless of how this system is implemented,the state’s direction of encouraging homesteads to voluntarily withdraw from the reform itself is already of great significance for breaking through the traditional homestead system.This article on the withdrawal system of homesteads was written in the context of such a major change in the land system.The housing site withdrawal system should be promoted cautiously.Homestead is the foundation for farmers to settle down,and it is the fundamental guarantee for China to realize the vision of "home ownership".Blindly promoting the withdrawal system of homesteads has the risk of privatization of homesteads;a series of measures implemented in various places to form homestead exit cases and complete "political tasks" arranged by superiors will stimulate farmers to have unrealistic property imaginations on homesteads,99% of remote rural homesteads do not have much property value.If they are left unused,they can only be reclaimed as arable land.In addition,the rash implementation of the homestead exit system will also create land and food in urban villages and suburban villages.This class does not comply with China’s "price increase and return to public" land system.In order to avoid the negative impact caused by the housing site withdrawal system,policies must be improved from various aspects.First of all,when designing the legal right for the withdrawal of homesteads,we must take the principle of protecting the interests of farmers and take into account the social security functions of the homesteads.The state can learn from many advanced practices in the pilot areas,such as appropriately raising the threshold for exiting homesteads,assessing the assets of farmers who exit homesteads,etc.,to prevent the irrational exit of farmers from homesteads,resulting in the absence of homesteads and the inability to settle in cities and towns.Of farmers can only gather in urban slums with serious adverse effects.In addition,the state must delay the pace of the withdrawal of homesteads,and must not rush.The withdrawal of homestead must be accompanied by the pace of urbanization.Never withdraw from the homestead ahead of time.It is also necessary to restrict the form of homestead withdrawal and strengthen the management of the homestead."One house,one home,overtaking is strictly prohibited." The state encourages farmers to voluntarily withdraw from homesteads,but they cannot be introduced in a government-led form such as increase or decrease.This will lead to the "idling" of the homestead withdrawal system and will seriously waste state resources. |