Research On The Performance System Of Dujiangyan Public Security Bureau

As continue to deepen the reform of political system and economic system in our country,the functions of the government also began to transfer from "managed" to "service-oriented".As a public security organ is not only the administrative organs is an important functional departments of criminal judicial organ,a security the important responsibility of the people to live and work in peace and contentment,social stability,its system reform and the team are continuously strengthen,but there is also a lack of service consciousness,is not high,to a large extent affected the relationship between the.Therefore,this article selects the Dujiangyan city public security bureau as the research object,with the construction of Dujiangyan city public security bureau performance appraisal system,the study of Dujiangyan city public security bureau performance appraisal system.First of all,based on relevant theories and research status,analyzes the Dujiangyan city public security bureau of the current performance evaluation mechanism and assessment ideas,a brief introduction to the public security organ organization performance appraisal characteristics,evaluation methods and the problems existing in the current assessment.Second,design the Dujiangyan city public security bureau performance appraisal system,from performance indicators weight,comparative analysis,emphasis of the assessment of different types of body weight.Finally,aiming at problems in Dujiangyan city public security bureau institution performance evaluation system put forward the corresponding countermeasures and Sug(1)According to the analysis of the status quo of Dujiangyan City Public Security Bureau’s assessment system standards,it is found that there is a relatively single subject of performance appraisal,the evaluation is relatively subjective,the performance appraisal index setting is lacking in pertinence,there are many process indicators,and the performance appraisal lacks of competitiveness.Feedback and other issues.(2)Using the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the performance evaluation system of the Dujiangyan City Public Security Bureau,it can be seen that in the first-level indicators of the performance evaluation system of the Dujiangyan City Public Security Bureau,the indexes of the government-affiliated institutions and the police stations are consistent,and the basic work is The key performance appraisalitems;and in the second-level index analysis,the bureaus have more emphasis on logistical support,administrative functions and other types of work,the police station agencies in terms of index weight is more focused on the implementation of job-related indicators.(3)Through analysis and research,this paper proposes to improve the assessment and supervision mechanism,implement a public performance appraisal system,and establish a performance appraisal responsibility investigation system;improve the appraisal body appraisal system,improve the quality of appraisal subjects;improve the appraisal results application mechanism,establish an effective appraisal feedback system and Improve assessment and incentive mechanisms and other measures.