Research On Yuan’s Six Selected Anthology Of Wen Xuan

In this paper,the main research object is the reproduction of Pei’s Six Selected Anthology of Wen Xuan by Yuan Jiong’s Jia Qu Tang turn over in Guang Du in Song dynasty,which is collected by the National Library of Congress of Japan.Detailed comparison with other annotation books,including five-liegeman comment version,Li Shan version and combined version.According to the results of collation,we can infer the relationship between different editions,summarize the changing rules between editions,and understand the value of editions of Yuan engraved edition.The main body of the thesis is divided into seven chapters.Chapter one: an overview of Yuan’s Six Selected Anthology of Wen Xuan.This chapter is divided into three parts: the current research situation of Yuan’s Six Selected Anthology of Wen Xuan,the features of edition and the edition information of Yuan engraved edition in bibliographic works.Chapter two,the source of Yuan’s engraving.The 19 th volume of Yuan engraved edition has Li-Shan version in the front and five-liegeman comment version in the back,which comes from Jian Zhou system.And Yuan’s engraving is in terms of catalogue,compared with Korean edition closer to Ming Zhou.Chapter three,the study of Yuan engraved original annotation.There are five-liegeman comment version official notes and Li-Shan’s notes in Yuan’s engraved,while there are a few in Ming Zhou’s version.When Yuan’s engraved five-liegeman comment version and Li Shan annotations,he followed the way of Xiu Zhou merging,splitting five-liegeman comment version and Li Shan’s annotations,which resulted in the change of the name of the annotation.Through the comparison,it is found that yuan engraved is closer to Zheng De than Chen Balang in the name of five-liegeman comment version.In terms of school language,compared with Korean edition,Yuan’s engraved has a closer relationship with Ming Zhou.Chapter four,the change from note book to Manuscript.Through the comparison between Yuan’s engraved and note edition,it is found that there is a relatively established five official edition in the transition from the manuscript to the manuscript,while the five official edition and Zheng De edition used by Pei’s edition in Guangdu should have come from the same established edition.In the aspect of Li Shan,there are more detailed parts of Collected Annotations on Wen Xuan than those of Yuan engraved.There are also parts of Li Shan’s version included in Collected Annotations on Wen Xuan that appear in the five liegeman comment edition of Yuan engraved.Chapter five,the location of notes in Yuan’s Edition.By comparing with other editions,this paper clarifies the characteristics of Yuan engraved edition’s deletion of five liegeman comment version and Li Shan version.It is found that Yuan’s engraving is closer to Ming Zhou than Xiu Zhou.Chapter six,the research on the deletion of version in Yuan engraved.By comparing with other editions,make clear the characteristics of Yuan’s Edition deleting the version of five-liegeman and Li Shan.The seventh chapter,the value and deficiency of Yuan’s Edition.Affirming Yuan’s Edition and value in the history of Wen Xuan,and summarizing Yuan’s Edition.