Font Size: a A A

A Comparative Study Of The Semantic Field Of "Cheating" In Modern Chinese,Dialects And Ancient Chinese

Posted on:2021-08-01Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:M LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2505306095968079Subject:Chinese Philology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The semantic field of "cheating" widely exists in the three dimensions of modern Chinese,dialect and ancient Chinese,and the semantic field contains a large number of words and varies greatly from different levels,which is of great academic value.This paper makes a comparative study of the three dimensions of "cheating" semantic sites including verbs from three aspects: semantics,grammar and pragmatics.In modern Chinese,the semantic field of "cheating" includes such words as "pian(骗),qi(欺),zha(诈),meng(蒙),hong(哄),kuang(诓),dai(绐),kuang(诳),man(谩),jue(谲)".At the semantic level,the emphasis of each member is different.At the grammatical level,the grammatical functions of the central member and the non-central member are quite different.At the pragmatic level,the context and the conversational meaning of each word are also different.Dialects contain the unique way of thinking and knowledge system of local people.Modern Chinese dialects contain more verbs than mandarin and ancient Chinese.They include 26 words,such as: "hong(哄),pian(骗),xia(吓),huang(谎),dou(逗),e(呃),shan(),che(彻),chuo(辵),zhuo(謶),zhuang(状),xue(噱),gun(滚),meng(蒙),xuan(楦),huo(豁),shao(烧),ma(麻),he(呵),kuang(诓),luo(罗),tuan(?),hu(唬),hun(诨),su(苏),zhuan(赚)." This paper selects 42 dialect points as the research object,observes the differences of semantic field verbs in different places,and points out that the main reasons for the differences.In ancient Chinese,the semantic field of "cheating" includes "qi(欺),zha(诈),wu(诬),man(谩),dai(绐),kuang(诳),kuang(诓),wang(罔),gui(诡),dan(诞),xuan(谖),jue(谲),pian(骗),zhuan(赚),hong(哄)." They do not appear at the same time,and the distribution in the literature is unbalanced.From the period of ancient Chinese to the period of modern Chinese,the semantic field of"cheating " in ancient Chinese has changed.There are also semantic,grammatical and pragmatic differences between members.The purpose of the comparative study of the members of the "cheating" semantic field in modern Chinese,dialect and ancient Chinese lies not in their basic meanings,but in their distinctive features in meaning and usage.In the use of language,if we can make full use of these distinguishing features,the expression will be more accurate,more appropriate and more vivid.
Keywords/Search Tags:semantic field, cheating, comparative
PDF Full Text Request
Related items