Public Participation In The Ecological Compensation System

The ecological compensation system is of great significance for ecological environmental protection.Since the 1970 s,our country has gradually started a slow and firm exploration of this system.It is a system with a variety of interest relationships.The main operating principle is to coordinate environmental interests and economic interests,require compensation for those who destroy the ecology or enjoy the ecological benefits,or reward those who protect the ecology.However,the reality is that the development of the ecological compensation system in China has encountered many difficulties.Special legal documents have not been promulgated.The content of the compensation standards and compensation methods is unknown.The implementation process encountered many obstacles and did not achieve the expected results.When we explore the reasons for this situation,it will be found that ecological compensation system in today’s excessive government-led mode of operation,showing a palliative embarrassing situation,the effect is short-lived,and not satisfactory.If you look at the surface,we will consider only the level of government management problem,but a closer look at nature,but a closer look at nature,we will find that this is actually due to the lack of participation of social subjects in the process of complex political forces playing with each other.Public participation in the ecological compensation system is necessary,and it is of great significance for ecological compensation.At the same time,it is everyone’s obligation and responsibility to protect the ecological environment.Whether from the perspective of rights or obligations,public participation in the ecological compensation system is taken for granted..Based on the above reasons,it is of great significance to study the specific application of public participation in the ecological compensation system.The first part elaborates a series of negative impacts of the lack of public participation on the operation of the ecological compensation system under thecurrent social background.It is mainly reflected in five aspects: It is mainly reflected in five aspects: the satisfaction of the compensation and the compensated parties on the compensation standard is low;the compensation method is single and cannot be flexibly selected;the compensation structure is unreasonable;under the premise of inadequate internal supervision,there is also a lack of external supervision;a lack of legal system guarantees and insufficient fair support.The existence of these problems is not caused solely by the lack of public participation.The disadvantages of the ecological compensation system itself also have some impacts.However,if public participation is introduced and a reasonable system design is adopted,these negative effects can be greatly eliminated.Therefore,these issues fully reflect the urgency of the need for public participation in the ecological compensation system.The second part further explores the necessity of introducing public participation.This part discusses from three aspects: first,the introduction of public participation can balance the complex interests in the ecological compensation system to a great extent;second,the introduction of public participation can stimulate the enthusiasm of public participation and promote the efficiency of government work,thereby Improve the implementation effect of the ecological compensation system;Finally,according to the comparison of the similarities and differences of public participation in other different systems,it reflects the necessity of detailed research on public participation in different systems.The three aspects corroborate each other and demonstrate the great value and significance of public participation in the ecological compensation system.The third part illustrates the feasibility of public participation in the ecological compensation system.Feasibility is also reflected in three aspects: one is at the practical level,which is mainly discussed from the perspective of diversification of participation channels and participation in networking;the second is from the perspective of the institutional foundation,the public participation system has developed significantly and the research on the ecological compensation system has not stopped,and there are some advanced experiences at home and abroad toprovide institutional guarantees.Third,there is some theoretical support.The three major theories of environmental rights theory,public product theory,and environmental interest game theory has also proved the feasibility of public participation in the ecological compensation system.The fourth part is to analyze the specific application construction of public participation in the ecological compensation system from the internal perspective.Firstly,the specific scope of "public" in the public participation ecological compensation system was clearly defined;secondly,in terms of the specific participation scope,the public participation design in the compensation standards,compensation methods,and supervision links was discussed in three points;finally,by building specific legal provisions to ensure that there is a legal basis for ensuring public participation in the ecological compensation system.The fifth part analyzes the construction of specific applications from an external perspective.First of all,in order to make a good foundation for public participation,suggestions are made on environmental information disclosure;secondly,it is suggested to build a government accountability mechanism in the ecological compensation system,so as to complement the external public supervision mentioned in Part IV;and finally,innovate the government performance evaluation model,and introduce the green GDP mechanism.The sixth part is the concluding part of the article.The purpose and function is to further summarize and sublimate the previous five parts,and point out the shortcomings and research prospects of the thesis,complete the writing intention of the article,strive to build an ecological compensation system that enables full public participation.