Research On The Effect Assessment System Of The Project On Climate Change

Climate change has brought many negative effects,such as rising global temperatures,rising sea levels and increasing number of disaster events.Countries in the world are actively tackling climate change.As a responsible and responsible country,China has made a great contribution to combating climate change and in 2020 has proposed the goal of achieving a carbon peak by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060.Responding to climate change and achieving new goals requires the support of low-carbon technologies,funds,and policies,and the implementation of technologies and policies requires a large amount of funding.Currently facing problems such as a large funding gap and blind capital investment,there is a lack of tools to attract and guide capital to the field of climate change,and at the same time,it is impossible to assess the impact of capital investment on climate change,which weakens the attractiveness of projects in the field of climate change.China is limited to using the result indicator of carbon emissions as an assessment of the effect of addressing climate change,and underestimating the project's contribution to addressing climate change.Based on relevant literature guidelines,this article combines quantitative indicators with qualitative indicators to establish an evaluation system for the project's response to climate change effects.This evaluation system can guide the flow of funds to the field of climate change.First of all,from the perspective of greenhouse gas quantification,the article clarifies the necessity and significance of the project as a research object,which is the basic unit to implement funds and achieve goals.Secondly,the article analyzes the important concepts related to the assessment system,such as climate change response,low-carbon development,green finance,and climate investment and financing,and defines the research scope of the assessment system.Comparing the focus of relevant principles and standards at home and abroad,and analyzing the current research status of domestic and foreign response to climate change assessment,it lays the foundation for the construction of the assessment system.Based on the principles and standards related to the response to climate change,the design project is based on the three criteria of relevance,path and effect to develop the indicators of the climate change system.The Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to determine the weight of each indicator of the effect evaluation system,and the three criteria of relevance,path and effect The weights are: 10.01%,38.94% and 51.05%.A comprehensive evaluation model for the evaluation criteria and system for each index has been established,and the final evaluation results are presented in the form of a hundred mark system.And using the hundred mark system to quantify the evaluation level,visually and clearly identify the ideal degree of the project's contribution to climate change,so as to build a complete evaluation system.Finally,317 actual projects were used to verify the rationality of the system.Using SPSS software to statistically analyze the assessment results,and comparing the actual impacts of different industry sectors and different types of projects in response to climate change.The power and heat production industries have more obvious effects on climate change,and projects that save energy and improve energy efficiency have advantages in responding to climate change.Comparing the results of the project evaluation with only the results of carbon emission reduction indicators,the situation is basically the same,but there are also differences.The main reason is that the evaluation system considers more key indicators that are conducive to climate change and that are conducive to achieving goals.