| This thesis deals with algorithmic problems in discrepancy theory and lattices, and is based on two projects I worked on while at the University of Washington in Seattle. A brief overview is provided in Chapter 1 (Introduction).;Chapter 2 covers joint work with Avi Levy and Thomas Rothvoss in the field of discrepancy minimization. A well-known theorem of Spencer shows that any set system with n sets over n elements admits a coloring of discrepancy O(√n). While the original proof was non-constructive, recent progress brought polynomial time algorithms by Bansal, Lovett and Meka, and Rothvoss. All those algorithms are randomized, even though Bansal's algorithm admitted a complicated derandomization. We propose an elegant deterministic polynomial time algorithm that is inspired by Lovett-Meka as well as the Multiplicative Weight Update method. The algorithm iteratively updates a fractional coloring while controlling the exponential weights that are assigned to the set constraints. A conjecture by Meka suggests that Spencer's bound can be generalized to symmetric matrices. We prove that n x n matrices that are block diagonal with block size q admit a coloring of discrepancy O(√n . √log(q)). Bansal, Dadush and Garg recently gave a randomized algorithm to find a vector x with entries in {--1,1} with ∥Ax∥infinity ≤ O(√log n) in polynomial time, where A is any matrix whose columns have length at most 1. We show that our method can be used to deterministically obtain such a vector.;In Chapter 3, we discuss a result in the broad area of lattices and integer optimization, in joint work with Rebecca Hoberg, Thomas Rothvoss and Xin Yang. The number balancing (NBP) problem is the following: given real numbers a1,...,an in [0,1], find two disjoint subsets I1,I2 of [ n] so that the difference |sumi∈I1a i -- sumi∈I2ai| of their sums is minimized. An application of the pigeonhole principle shows that there is always a solution where the difference is at most O √n/2n). Finding the minimum, however, is NP-hard. In polynomial time, the differencing algorithm by Karmarkar and Karp from 1982 can produce a solution with difference at most n--theta(log n), but no further improvement has been made since then. We show a relationship between NBP and Minkowski's Theorem. First we show that an approximate oracle for Minkowski's Theorem gives an approximate NBP oracle. Perhaps more surprisingly, we show that an approximate NBP oracle gives an approximate Minkowski oracle. In particular, we prove that any polynomial time algorithm that guarantees a solution of difference at most 2√n/2 n would give a polynomial approximation for Minkowski as well as a polynomial factor approximation algorithm for the Shortest Vector Problem. |
