Study On Difference Of Multi-dimensional Poverty Reduction Effect Of Rural Land Consolidation Under Different Modes

The solution to poverty is not only an important link in building a moderately prosperous society in respects and achieving social equity,but also a long-standing topic in the field of scientific research.The government has made many efforts in poverty alleviation work and has achieved remarkable achievement.So far,China has achieved a reduction of 740 million poor people and made outstanding contributions to the world's poverty alleviation work.But now the people's demands for living standards have been further enhanced,with the development of social economy,so the standard of poverty alleviation has gradually shifted from a single dimension to a multidimensional synthesis.Outline of China's Rural Poverty Alleviation and Development(2011-2020)put forward new requirements for poverty alleviation which called “Two Need and Three Guarantees”.Land is closely related to the production and life of farmers for it is an important resource and asset,Therefore,the consolidation and utilization of land will affect the livelihood of farmers.Land consolidation has gradually become a platform for poverty alleviation,in the practice of poverty alleviation in various poverty areas.Many national level planning has proposed that we should attach importance to the role of land consolidation to "helping poverty alleviation",such as National Land Improvement Plan(2016-2020)and Outline of poverty alleviation and development.As a participatory land remediation model,rural land consolidation under PPP model(RLCP)played an important role in rural poverty alleviation practice,it has multi-channel access to funds,and can cooperate with farmer to reduce their poverty through the development of agricultural industry.In order to further clarify the poverty reduction effect brought about by the implementation of the the RLCP,this paper examine the multi-dimensionality of poverty reduction in the RLCP based on the analysis of relevant mechanisms,and measure its net effect of poverty reduction in all dimensions.Hope that we can provide a workable reference about the exploration for new land consolidation model,in the practice of rural poverty alleviation.We select 315 households from 3 administrative villages as research samples both in land consolidation project area and unrenovated area of Enshi city,Hubei province.Then analysis the multi-dimensional poverty reduction effect of the RLCP by using PSM-DID,based on multidimensional poverty indicators and covariate indicators.At last,regression of covariates that affect farmers' multidimensional poverty by fixed effect model.Finally came to the following conclusion:(1)Rural land consolidation under PPP model could alleviate the multi-dimensionalpoverty of farmers: Promote an increase in income,number of vocational education,per capita housing area,number of living facilities,and educe the possibility of unemployment.(2)Rural land consolidation under traditional model(RLCT)could only increase the income of farmers.When using the DID model and the PSM-DID model to measure the multidimensional poverty reduction effects of rural land remediation under traditional model,only the income dimension passed the significance test,and the net effect is smaller than RLCP.(3)From the results of the regression of the fixed effect model,we analysis of factors affecting farmers' multidimensional poverty,including income,education,housing,living,employment.For income dimension,the positive factors are household's education level,and the number of household labor,while the negative factor is household's age;For education dimension,the positive factors are the number of agricultural laborers and cultivated land area,the negative factor is also household's age;For health dimension,the positive factors are the number of children under 15 years old and the number of household labor;For house dimension,the negative factors are household's age,household's education level,the number of people over 65 years old,the negative factor is family size;For life dimension,the positive factors are household's education level and to family size,the negative factor is household's age.For employment dimension,the positive factors are family size and the number of household labor,the negative factor is household's age.Based on the above research conclusions,we propose following suggestions:(1)Pay attention to the role of land consolidation in poverty alleviation,increase scale and extend the scope where conditions permit,set up a special fund for land consolidation to broaden financing channels.Establish an immediate feedback mechanism also involved in hearings and arguments to increase farmer participation.(2)give full play to the advantages of the RLCP in multi-dimensional poverty alleviation,consider multidimensional poverty alleviation function in project introduction contacting the actual situation of the farmer.First introduce the multi-dimensional poverty reduction function in the project,Pay attention to the projects that contribute to the development of specialty agricultural industries and poverty alleviation in rural areas.Then,strengthening the coupling of the RLCP and rural poverty alleviation,let experienced farmers establish docking guidance with poor households or new farmers,use the whole village promotion and infrastructure transformation projects to promote poverty alleviation and dilapidated housing reform for poor households.(3)Strengthening the development of characteristicagricultural industries in rural land consolidation,cultivate new agricultural farmer.Explore the potential of local resources and form a characteristic industry with both economic and social benefits in forward-looking and planning awareness.Establish a skills exchange group and conduct expert guidance symposium for both of skill transfer and feedback.Thoroughly implement the spirit of “integration of production,study and research”.(4)Improve management mechanism,establish institutional guarantee for rural land consolidation in the proceeding of poverty alleviation.Frist,establish a mobile cooperation mechanism,According to the actual situation of the farmers,Clear access rules in the process of land transfer and shareholding.Than,improve relevant laws and regulations to clarify powers and responsibilities and dispute resolution procedures or processing channels between farmers and enterprise;Establish a scientific enterprise access and elimination mechanism,identify a set of screening and review systems,researching and assessing regularly to ensure the sustainability of the project.Last,create a scientific and reasonable price formation and financial subsidy mechanism,relevant government departments should conduct price audits on a regular basis to enhanced cost monitoring and sound price adjustment mechanism.Strengthening support for companies with significant public benefits,Furthermore,we should safeguarding the public welfare of rural land consolidation and the sustainability of poverty reduction.