Study On The Problems Of Rural Poverty Management:from The Perspective Of Rural Subsistence Allowance And Poverty Alleviation

The 18^th national congress puts forward clearly to build a well-off society in an all-round way.The core of building a moderately prosperous society in all respects lies in its comprehensiveness,in tackling extreme poverty.The majority of the extreme poverty is in rural areas.At the present stage,There are many problems in rural development:The development model of high consumption and low output,severe air pollution,serious water pollution,the safety of agricultural products,inadequate market response capacity and the issue of left-behind are increasingly reflected in the rural development process.It also restricts the healthy and sustainable development of rural economic society.Trapped in such a vicious cycle,there is an urgent need to find solutions to help rural areas out of development difficulties,help farmers out of poverty.Rural poverty is a big national problem.Our state has also formulated a series of measures to benefit farmers.This paper only selected the rural subsistence allowance system and poverty alleviation and development policy as the entry point.Study the connection between the two to help rural poverty governance.Minimum living guarantee policy and poverty alleviation development policy are two major livelihood projects implemented by the government in china.They have played a huge role in their respective fields in tackling poverty.In 2009,the state department released the<Notice on the effective connection between the minimum standard of living guarantee system and the poverty alleviation and development policy in rural areas>.Thus the connection between the two systems was officially launched.It has past nine years since the two policies'cohesion.Pilot work in the corresponding areas and units have also begun to see results.But there are also some problems in the connection between the two systems.In academia,there are also some achievements in the study of the connection between the two systems.Both the support of theoretical research and experience of actual experimental work have been concluded.But compared with the research of poverty alleviation development policy and minimum living guarantee policy,the study of the connection between the two is very scarce,not so perfect,thus can not theoretically guide the work of anti-poverty,also can not make the real intention come into play.This paper will focus on the two system cohesion as the breakthrough point,find problems,propose solutions and suggestions and supplement the theoretical deficiency,which will also guide the implementation of practical work.This paper will compare two basic concepts of the system,course of development and the similarities and differences and discover the problems that exist in the process.By choosing a typical case present the problems in which way will be more intuitive and easier to understand.Put forward specific opinions and suggestions.Through comparison and discovery,we can see that the two systems are dominated by the government and aim to help poor families and the population to ensure a basic life.Both implement dynamic management and gradually be socialized by incorporating social forces in poverty governance.At the same time,we must see the implementation time and development course are different,the object recognition standards are different,the difference between blood transfusion and hematopoiesis.These differences lead to the disjointed phenomenon in the actual process of policy implementation.There are four signs of this disconnect:Different identification standards of policy object make it difficult to verify the income;It is difficult to achieve coordination among different administrative departments;The separation of two lines and two libraries leads to the confusion of information collection;Different ways of raising rescue funds and different effects of helping.It is these disjointed problems that lead to the repeated identification of the poor object,separately poverty management,waste of poverty alleviation resources and new social injustice.In order to solve these problems,we're supposed to take measures as followed.Firstly,set up integral management idea.Secondly,strengthen the coordination and cooperation between the governing bodies.Thirdly,speed up the realization of"two lines in one".Fourthly,establish a mechanism to guide the needs of poverty-stricken resources.Fifthly,build an information sharing mechanism for allocating poverty alleviation resources.Sixthly,advocate the establishment and implementation of a universal social security system.Through the implementation of the above measures,it is expected that the two systems will be effectively linked and contribute to the anti-poverty work in our country.Therefore,we can eradicate poverty at an early date and achieve a moderately prosperous society.