Experimental Research On Blended Teaching Method In Badminton Teaching

With the development of network information technology and the deepening of teaching curriculum reform,the combination of teaching curriculum and network media has become a major mainstream of the current teaching reform.In daily life,students learn more from the network,enrich themselves through the online knowledge dissemination of mobile phones,computers and other electronic products.More and more schools are in the new era Generation background also began to use online platform to manage students and impart knowledge content.By combining the new teaching tools with the current traditional physical education,this paper applies the hybrid teaching method to the badminton teaching,which can not only meet the students' learning needs,but also stimulate the students' interest in learning,improve the students' initiative to participate in badminton learning,so as to achieve the purpose of improving the teaching effect of badminton.Under the background of the current information age,this kind of hybrid teaching,which connects the traditional badminton teaching with the network teaching,is worth studying and exploring.It is a new attempt to adopt Hybrid Teaching in badminton teaching.This attempt can provide some reference value for the follow-up scholars in the application of Hybrid Teaching in badminton teaching.The article adopts research methods such as literature data method,questionnaire survey method,expert interview method,teaching experiment method,mathematical statistics method,etc.to carry out blended teaching of basic badminton technology,and integrate theadvantages and disadvantages of traditional badminton teaching method and network teaching to establish New teaching mode of basic badminton skills.In the teaching,experimental methods were used to divide students of Changsha Health Vocational College 2019 in clinical medicine into a control group and an experimental group,each of 30 people.In the experimental group,the mixed teaching method was used to teach basic badminton techniques.In the control group,The traditional badminton teaching method is used in teaching.With reference to the relevant literature on blended teaching at home and abroad,and combined with the suggestions of experts,the experiment of blended teaching is carried out.There were no significant differences in the technical level between the two groups,and external factors such as teaching content,teachers,venues,equipment,and teaching duration remained the same.The comparison between the control group and the experimental group in the basic technical assessment of badminton,combined with the collation and analysis of the results of the questionnaire,the following conclusions are drawn:1.Through the pre-test comparative analysis of the students in the control group and the experimental group in three aspects of basic situation,physical quality and basic technology before the experiment,we can know that the corresponding test significance p value of each item in the two groups is greater than 0.05,no matter in height,weight or physical quality,as well as in forehand high ball,forehand pick ball,forehand hit high ball,footwork There is no significant difference in the four basic techniques,which shows that the two groups of students are at the same level in all aspects,ensuring the objectivity of the experiment.2.After comparing the basic techniques of single badminton after the experiment,it was found that the P value of the control group was0.40(> 0.05)with no difference in the forehand high and long shot technique.The P value of the experimental group was 0.00(<0.05).Difference;in the forehand forehand picking technique,the control group had a P value of 0.27(> 0.05),there was no difference,and the experimental group had a P value of 0.00(<0.05);the backfield forehand hit the high-distance ball technically The P value of the control group was0.16(> 0.05),and there was no difference.The P value of the experimental group was 0.00(<0.05),which was different.In the full-field gait technique,the P value of the control group was 0.58(>0.05).Difference,P value in the experimental group is 0.01(<0.05),which is different.The technical improvement of the experimental group has significant differences,while the technical improvement of the control group does not have significant differences,confirming that the mixed teaching method has a better grasp of students' individual technical level than the traditional teaching method.3.In the total score results,the P value of the control group was 0.12(> 0.05),indicating that the total score before and after the control group had no difference;the P value of the experimental group was 0.00(<0.05),indicating that the total score before and after the test group Be different.The mixed teaching method in the experimental group is more stable in improving the skills than the traditional teaching method in the control group.4.In terms of teaching methods,the test significance P of the two groups is 0.00(<0.05),which is significant;in terms of learning interest,the test significance P of the two groups is 0.00(<0.05),which is significant;in In terms of voluntary exercise,the test significance of the two groups was 0.01(<0.05),which was significant.From the analysis of data,students' recognition of mixed teaching is stronger than traditional teaching methods,and the learning interest in mixed teaching classrooms is higher than in traditional teaching classrooms.Of students are more proactive than traditionally taught students.No matter the traditional teaching method or the mixed teaching method,it can promote the achievement of badminton,but compared with the traditional teaching method,the mixed teaching method is more significant in improving the score,and the learning interest is more than the traditional teaching The students under the program are more intensive,and the learning effect is better than the students under traditional teaching,and they have a deeper understanding of technology.