Research On Government Credibility Improvement In Digital Government Environment

The issue of government credibility is a long-standing problem with the government.At present,China is in an important period of economic and social transformation.The complexity and difficulty of social governance are increasing,and the issue of government credibility is becoming more and more prominent.At the same time,the rapid development of digital technology has promoted the digital transformation of society,and the digital society has called for the establishment of digital government.Combining the reality that China is in the practice of digital government construction,this paper attempts to use the thinking of digital government governance to seek the path of government credibility improvement in the digital context.Based on the above ideas,the paper mainly studies the problem in six parts:The first part introduces the social reality background and the value of the research.The domestic and foreign literatures have been sorted out on the two themes of government credibility and digital government,and a macroscopic understanding of the relevant status of research subjects has been formed.In this way,the specific ideas,methods and possible innovations of the research are presented.The second part first analyzes the basic connotation of government credibility.In the historical background of China and the West,the historical origin of government credibility is analyzed It mainly combines relevant domestic research results and clarifies the key core of government credibility:First,the ultimate goal of government credibility is to achieve the goal of national and government social governance;second,the key to the government's credibility is the government's own construction;third,the government's credibility Ultimately,it is determined by the attitude of the public and the satisfaction of the government.On this basis,the connotation of government credibility is given.In addition,the theoretical logic of government credibility construction has been studied and analyzed from the theory of social contract,limited government theory and responsible government theory.Secondly,it mainly analyzes and expounds the connotation characteristics of digital government and the specific practice in China.In the process of digital government development and evolution,digital technology is an important support and the different stages of technology development have led to the continuous renewal and evolution of digital government.At the current stage,the digital government contains new features.First,the digital government is a form of government development in different social contexts;second,the digital government is a new way for the government to achieve effective social governance;third,the current stage of digital government is the transformation of government functions driven by government data.The practice of digital government in China mainly uses the two modes of practice of digital government in Zhejiang and Guangdong to analyze and form a basic understanding of digital government construction.Finally,a detailed analysis of the relationship between the government's credibility and digital government construction reveals that the two are highly compatible with the value requirements and objectives,thus providing a logical basis for promoting the credibility of the government by means of digital government governance thinking.The third part mainly introduces the status quo of the government's credibility construction.First,through the study of important government documents of the party and the central government over the years,the government's credibility is divided into three main time periods,and the government's focus is different at different time periods.In the initial stage,the government paid attention to the disclosure of information,and then began to shift to the direction of promoting government functions.Finally,it focused on the governance system and governance capabilities.Secondly,on the basis of analyzing the effectiveness of the existing measures of government credibility construction,it explains the challenges and problems faced by the government's credibility under the current conditions:First,the overall imbalance of social development;second,the improvement of the civic awareness of the public and the process of democratization The delay is;the third is the weakening of government discourse power during the period of social digital transformation;the fourth is the inconsistency between government governance capacity and actual demand.The fourth part mainly analyzes the causes of the difficulties to improve current government credibility.The first is that social environmental factors hinder the improvement of government credibility.Among them,in the market economy environment,the value transformation of society and the differentiation of interest groups and the secularization of government authority in the digital social background are its main manifestations.Second,the government's own shortcomings are also an important reason for the government's credibility building.It includes four aspects:one is due to the current lack of government functions;the second is the lack of government executive power;the third is due to the lack of effective supervision of public power;the fourth is that the current level of government openness is still low.Finally,the public has also affected the construction of the government's credibility.Specifically,it is manifested in the lack of participation in the public society,excessive participation,and lack of participation channel mechanisms.The fifth part mainly proposes relevant suggestions on the improvement of government credibility from the perspective of digital government construction.It is divided into four aspects:one is to update the value to build government credibility;the second is to improve the government's social governance;the third is to improve the government's openness;the fourth is to enhance the level of public participation in governance.The sixth part mainly include the formation of research conclusions and prospects for subsequent research.