Study On The Interactive Communication Between Two Public Opinion Fields In An Emergency

With the rise of new technologies,civilians have never had an opportunity to express themselves.The appearance of private public opinion has broken the discourse structure dominated by the official public opinion field in the past.The objective existence of the two public opinion fields will inevitably lead to the fight for discourse power.In particular,when an unexpected event occurs,both the official public opinion field and the public opinion field enter the active period at the same time.At this time,if the two cannot perform good interaction,they will have adverse effects on the social mood and even hinder the final solution of the problem.Therefore,in-depth discussion and research on the interaction between the "official public opinion field" and the "private public opinion field" will not only promote the benign development cycle of the two games,but also effectively coordinate the two developments,and try to evade the lack of interaction between the two.This type of problem has important implications for establishing a good public opinion environment and maintaining social stability.This paper is based on field theory and other relevant theories of journalism,and comprehensively uses literature research method,content analysis method,comparative analysis method and other research methods to study and analyze the interaction of two public opinion fields in emergencies.The article is mainly divided into four parts.First of all,it defines the concept that emerges from the research and outlines the basic research theories.Secondly,analyze the formation mechanism of the two public opinion fields and their respective transmission characteristics.Then it explores the appearance and interactive forms of the two public opinion fields in different types of emergencies and grasps their interaction patterns.Finally,find the problems arising from the two interactions and try to answer how to construct a positive interaction mechanism between the two public opinion fields.