Font Size: a A A

Feng Mu And Ten Years Of New Period Literature(1976-1986)

Posted on:2021-01-30Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y J HouFull Text:PDF
GTID:2415330620961720Subject:Chinese Modern and Contemporary Literature
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The 1980 s were a time of great changes and numerous literary and artistic thoughts.After breaking free from the shackles of the " the Great Cultural Revolution",many scholars were eager to express their feelings,or to complain about their sufferings,or to look forward to the future.Feng Mu Has a place in the literary.He is also the witness of this colorful era.As a leader,editor and critic in the literary and art circles,Feng Mu has made a lot of achievements in the early decade of the new era.He plays an important role in the debates of "scar literature","reform literature" and "modernism".From his various arrangements in "scar literature" and "reform literature" and his position in the debate on "modernism",we can find Feng Mu's literary concept and social ideal.In many literary trends,the competition of discourse power also reflects the inevitable contradictions and entanglements and intertwined complexity in the evolution of literature at that time from different aspects.By placing Feng Mu's literary practice in this complex historical state and combining with the historical context of the first ten years of the new period literature,this paper explores what role Feng Mmu played in this period.The first chapter starts with "scar literature",and on the basis of reading Feng Mu's literary criticism,speeches,letters and research materials of "scar literature",discusses how Feng Mu uses the Journal of Literature and Art as his chief editor to build public opinion space for "scar literature" and participate in the classicization of "scar literature".The first section analyzes the isomorphism of Feng Mu and "scar" writers from the perspective of his life experience and the theory of "political culture".The second section mainly reconstructs the historical scene of the "scar literature" ideological trend,and analyzes the real situation in the historical context Feng Mu was living in at that time from the multi-party argument.The second chapter discusses Feng Mu's choice and action under the historical situation that the debate of "scar literature" has not gone away and "reform literature",another controversial ideological trend,has appeared.To give support to Joe factory director in office,promote it and the author Jiang zilong to obtain a place in the literary world.According to the materials,Feng Mu's support for "reform literature" is not only his appreciation of literary creation,but also his strategic choice in the field of various power intertwined literature.At the same time,the end of this chapter starts with the relationship between "reform literature" and modernization,and discusses the historical scene of the birth and classicization of "reform literature".The third chapter discusses the literary field in which various powers are intertwined in the 1980 s.Based on the arguments of "modernists" and their respective positions in the literary field,the author defines the ideographical form of literature through literary imagination,and discusses Feng Mu's struggle for the right of literary interpretation under the anxiety of his multiple identities.At this time,Feng Mu's position has changed,and he fell out with his former friend.This chapter mainly studies the reasons for Feng Mu's change of position and the impetus for the emergence of the "modernist" debate,and discusses the ambiguous relationship between "modernist" and the environment in which Feng Mu grew up--"seventeen years of literature".The fourth chapter mainly discusses Feng Mu's multiple identity transformation in the early decade of the new period on the basis of the first three chapters,and discusses his real intention of supporting "scar literature" and "reform literature" and his position in the debate of "modernism".It also focuses on its expectation of rebuilding the historical totality under the insistence of the theory of revolutionary realism.Reconstruction of dialogue with history under the tide of "de-historization".
Keywords/Search Tags:Feng Mu, “Scar Literature”, “Reform Literature”, The "Modernist" debate, Historical totality
PDF Full Text Request
Related items