Reflection On The Way Of Prvate Art Museum Intervening Society

Private art museum as a social public institution,that will inevitably have relations with the citizens of the surrounding communities when it comes to life.For many reasons,the management mode of the official art gallery is difficult to enter into the "community",while the new private art gallery is full of vitality.After more than 20 years of development,it has preliminarily explored a way to intervene in the "community".With the development of economy,the spread speed of network information is faster and faster.Citizens are more free and open in media communication.They participate in social construction with a master image,and their democracy is further enhanced.In the process of intervention,situationism breaks the boundary between art and life,replaces the original understanding of social landscape through visual presentation,makes art intervention become the main way of participation,provides the audience with a diversified perspective,and promotes the audience to enter the public community and become a daily activity.In this aesthetic way,private art gallery is the best choice,let the audience participate in the community,this kind of possibility of acting as "social intermediary" into the public community is inevitable.In this paper,by using the method of empirical research and case analysis,we choose the "instrument Haus space" of Huang jue ping,Chongqing as the research object of the "private art museum".Through the three parts of the connotation and necessity of the "private art museum" into the community,"instrument Haus space" as an alternative way to express the intervention in society,and the strategy of the private art museum in the community,we discuss the "private beauty" The problem of the intervention of "Art Museum" in the community.At present,our society is still a former "civil society",in the process of specific intervention,it is still the compulsory intervention of artists and managers,and there is no way to get rid of "elitism" in theoperation mode.In the operation,the "instrument Haus space" is still in the exploration stage of "community art",and it has not really participated in the "community art".In the operation,it still faces the dilemma of lack of funds,strong intervention and the lack of "public" aesthetic culture.The key of community construction is the construction of aesthetic culture of the surrounding citizens themselves,which is also the lack of almost all private art galleries at present Of.In the construction of "citizen community",to make art become "Daily" in citizen’s life,we need to rely on the intervention of "social intermediary".If we leave the citizens who support "community",there is no meaning.Only by promoting the audience to build an "aesthetic community" and realizing the cultural sharing of "community art",can the private art galleries on the edge of the city be well involved in the urban cultural landscape.The construction of art gallery itself is closely related to the rights of citizens.The emphasis on "equity and sharing" in public education conforms to the essence of human development in civil society.It is inevitable to intervene in the community through "social intermediary" to develop the audience centered society.There are three requirements for private art museums to move towards "art community".The first is to try to separate from politics under the pseudo community,the second is to return to "Daily" in the intervention,and the third is to become a human clarion call leading to "civil society".After that,we still need to explore.Through continuous artistic intervention and public criticism,we can reflect on the operation mode of private art galleries,promote the development of private art galleries in China,so that we can enter into "community art" after the arrival of "civil society".