Research On A Comparative Study Of Cao Cao And Cao Zhi's Expressions

Cao Cao and Cao Zhi,as great writers of the table,play an important role in the history of the development of the text.Cao Cao's unique political status and personality make his Cao opera unique and add a lot of personal color to his solemn elegance.Cao Zhi,as a representative of early representative writing,combined strong emotion,skilled writing techniques and graceful language with extensive and rich political and life contents perfectly,which made the art of representative writing reach the ideal height of "appropriate literary quality",and thus established his status of "unique talent" in representative writing,and produced a far-reaching influence on later representative writing.Ring.The comparative study of Cao Cao's and Cao Zhi's writings has been discussed by predecessors,but most of them are fragmented and fragmentary evaluations,lacking systematic comparative analysis of their writings,which makes the later generations lack sufficient understanding of their writing characteristics and interrelations.This paper is based on Cao Cao and Cao Zhi's writings,starting from the perspective of document writing,starting from the macro,focusing on details,to find the similarities and unique styles of the two.This paper is divided into six chapters:The first chapter mainly summarizes the predecessors' research on Cao Cao's and Cao Zhi's epithets,presenting the research value of the "two Cao's" epithets.The second chapter studies the quantity,writing stages and value of the two Caos.According to the research,the number of Cao Cao's and Cao Zhi's writings ranked the highest in the Han Dynasty and the Wei and Jin Dynasties respectively;in writing stages,the two Cao's writings were obviously different in different periods;in value,Cao Cao promoted the development of report forms,and "two Cao" created a new writing mode.Chapter three compares the differences of the two writings in terms of their status changes and personality differences.When "Ercao" was a minister,they all expressed their praise and loyalty to the rulers,and at the same time stated the current situation of the country and offered suggestions.Because of different identities,Cao Cao mostly sought reward for the ministry,while Cao Zhi mostly recommended himself.Because of different personalities,Cao Cao's writings show superb political wisdom,while Cao Zhi's writings fully reflect the expression of kinship.Chapter ? starts with the external format and internal logic of the two Caos,and concludes that the structure of the two Caos is not only consistent in Title structure,but also similar in internal logic,and at the same time they follow the writing procedure of the previous article.But in the text composition,Cao Cao used the appendix innovatively and Cao Zhi still followed the old style.Chapter five explores the similarities and differences of the two Cao's expressions in terms of words,sentence patterns,language style and status.In terms of words,"Ercao" skillfully uses real words to make the language concise and vivid;uses function words to express the meaning better;and uses modest words skillfully in combination with specific contexts.In the aspect of sentence pattern,both parallel and scattered,harmonious and fluent.But different status,Cao Zhi used the humble word "Fu" with humble relationship,while Cao Cao used "stealing" and "cautious".Different language styles,Cao Cao's language is concise and concise,while Cao Zhi's language is beautiful and vivid.In terms of style,Cao Cao prefers short sentences while Cao Zhi prefers parallel sentences.Chapter 6 compares the common writing techniques of Er Cao's writings from four aspects: allusion,metaphor,contrast and direct narration.The commonality is that "two Caos" like to use allusions and euphemisms;they like to quote metaphors and use the same body;they use contrast skillfully to make their images deep;they narrate their stories directly and directly.The difference is that Cao Cao uses allusions in different ways,Cao Cao uses them in the opposite way while Cao Zhi uses them in the opposite way;the purpose of metaphor is different,Cao Cao is used to set off his character while Cao Zhi is more imaginative to express his loyalty;the types of direct narrative are different,Cao Cao is mostly a form of complaint and Cao Zhi is mostly a form of admonition;Cao Cao takes prose as his text and Cao Zhi is a form of fu.The conclusion is a review and summary of the full text.