| After the "918" incident,in 1932,Japan supported the puppet regime to establish a false Manchuria state.Japan has made many defends against the occupation of Northeast China,aiming at proving the legitimacy of the "Manchuria state" and the legitimacy of Japanese military operations.For this reason,Japan has thrown out various theories.The most representative ones are "Manchuria incident,Japan’s self-defense theory","Manchuria’s national self-determination theory" and "Japan’s goodwill theory ".At the same time,Japanese declared that the establishment of the "Manchuria country" is the national self-determination,spread theory that "good-will between Japan and‘Manchukuo’”,in an attempt to confuse the public,cover the history of aggression,in order to prove the "legitimacy" of Japan’s interests in "Manchuria" and the "inevitability"of the "Manchuria state".These aggressive public opinion disrupted the investigation of the National Union at that time,which have brought about very bad social influence.In early twentieth Century,Japan has dished out that “the Han nationality is not Manchuria nationality” and “ Manchuria is not Chinese territory”,in an attempt to split the Northeast China out.The related fallacies of Japan have aroused the attention of the people of the time and refute.We studied the related fallacies of Japan at that time,which helped to restore the historical truth and expose the essence of Japanese aggression.It help us to deepen our understanding of Sino Japanese relations,guard against and pay attention to the trend of revival of Japanese militarism,so as to correctly handle contemporary international relations.This article is divided into four parts.The first part mainly describes the Japanese public opinion "remarks related to the Manchuria incident,the Japanese self defense theory" the overview of "self-defense problem 918" night talk and "Manchuria maintenance rights" launched defensive remarks.The second part describes the Japanese public opinion in order to prove the legitimacy of Manchuria’s establishment,proposed the "Manchuria national self-determination ”theory,this part analyzes the Japanese public opinion" Manchuria self-determination theory "of the historical origin,realistic reason and coping with the international society of speech.The third part describes the" good-will between Japan and ‘Manchukuo’” theory,which was based on Japan and Manchuria’s friendly relationship,then analyzes the Japanese public opinions,which related with "good-will between Japan and ‘Manchukuo’” theory,contains background,reasons and the relationship with the “ Greater East Asia co prosperity sphere".The first part mainly introduces the political and economic background of Japan’s comments on the defense of its occupation of the northeast.It also introduces the historical origin of the related speech,and also discusses the situation of the Japanese public opinion in the country at that time.And it is mainly about the refutation of Japanese related speeches at that time.At the same time,it points out that some politicians and scholars in Japan still cannot see the history correctly,publicize the legitimacy of "Manchuria state" and deny Japan’s aggression in Northeast China.Studying Japan’s speech defending the invasion of Northeast China help people to deepen their historical understanding of Japanese aggression and establish a correct view of history.At the macro level,it can also provide reference for the development of bilateral relations. |