A Clinical Study Of Synergy Effect Of Emphasis Moxibustion At Baliao Points Combined With Acupuncture Method In The Treatment Of Chronic Diarrhea

Objective To make objective evaluation of the differences of curative effects between emphasis moxibustion at Baliao Points combined with acupuncture method and conventional acupuncture method,in order to verify the effectiveness and deficiency of emphasis moxibustion at Baliao Points combined with acupuncture method in the treatment of chronic diarrhea.Methods Used random number grouping method,divided 64 patients who met the inclusion criteria into treatment group and control group randomly,32 cases in each group.Emphasis moxibustion at Baliao Points combined with acupuncture method as the treatment group,and conventional acupuncture method as the control group.Patients in the two groups filled in the symptom score form for four times before the treatment,10 days after the treatment,the end of the treatment and 2 weeks after the treatment.By comparing the overall efficacy,total symptom scores and improvement in major and minor symptoms between the two groups,the correlation among syndrome type,age,course of disease and curative effect was analyzed.Results1.Clinical efficacy analysis: after 2 courses of treatment,the total effective rate in the control group was 84.3%,and in the the treatment group was 93.75%.By statistical analysis,P < 0.05,the difference was statistically significant.Then,the treatment group and the control group were compared within the group.P < 0.05,the differences were all statistically significant.2.Symptom integral analysis: comparison of the integral at 10 days after thetreatment,the end of the treatment and 2 weeks after the treatment between the treatment group and the control group P<0.05,the differences were statistically significant.3.Various symptoms comparison between two groups: before the treatment,the differences of major symptoms included diarrhea times and defecate state,and minor symptoms included abdominal distension and pain,anorexia and fatigue between the two groups were no significant,P> 0.05,which shows comparable.After the treatment,the differences of diarrhea times and abdominal distension between the two groups were statistically significant,P<0.05.However,the differences of defecate state,abdominal pain,anorexia and fatigue between the two groups were no significant.P>0.05.4.Analysis of syndrome type,age,course of disease and curative effect between the two groups:analysis of syndrome type and curative effect between the treatment group and the control group,P > 0.05,there was no significant difference in statistics;There was significant difference between age and curative effect in the treatment group(P < 0.05),but no significant difference in the control group(P> 0.05).Analysis of course of disease and curative effect between the treatment group and the control group,P > 0.05,there was no significant difference.Conclusion1.After two courses of treatment,the total effective rate in the treatment group was 93.75%,and in the control group was 84.3%.Both treatment methods were effective in the treatment of chronic diarrhea by comparison in the group,but the overall efficacy of the treatment group is better than that of the control group.2.Comparison of the symptom integral at 10 days after the treatment,the end of the treatment and 2 weeks after the treatment,the curative effect of the treatment group was obviously superior to that of the control group,indicating that the method in the treatment group was more effective than that in the control group.3.It was found that the therapeutic effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group when diarrhea times and abdominal distension were improved,but there was no significant difference between the two groups inimproving the symptoms of defecate stat,abdominal pain,anorexia and fatigue.4.In this study,there was no significant difference in the efficacy of each syndrome type.In the treatment group,younger patients had better efficacy than older patients.In the control group,there was no significant difference in the efficacy among different age groups.There was no significant difference between the curative effect and course of disease,but the effective rate could indicated that the shorter the course of disease is,the better the curative effect is,and the longer the course of disease is,the worse the curative effect is.Therefore,emphasis moxibustion at Baliao Points combined with acupuncture method has more advantages in improving clinical effective rate,diarrhea times and abdominal distension when treating chronic diarrhea,and this method is simple,safe and effective.At last,,it is a feasible thinking and method.