Application Research Of Economic Analysis In The Regulation Of Lhasa Dongcheng District

The renewal of the old city is a process in which countless economic rational individuals play each other.Therefore,the control detail planning of the old city should not only play the role of scientific management of redevelopment,but also ensure the economic benefits of stakeholders.Therefore,economic analysis is crucial for the control detail planning of the old city,and it is necessary to further strengthen the systematic use of economic thinking and analytical methods in the planning process.Some studies have attempted to construct an economic analysis framework for the whole process of the control detail planning,but lack empirical experience and do not address the particularity of the old city.Therefore,this study attempts to construct a systematic analysis framework for the whole process of the control detail planning,using input-output analysis at the district level,control unit level,and block level to measure the economic benefits at different scales.The results of analysis may feedback policy or developing strategies,making economic analysis not only stay at the level of technical research,but also become an effective tool for practical work.The research object selected in this study is the Dongcheng District of Lhasa City,Tibet Autonomous Region.This area is a typical stock-type development area,and will become an important part of the function of the old city of Lhasa in the future.After analysis,it is found that: 1)At the slice level,when the compensation coefficient is 1.37,the development cost and benefit are balanced,and the final recommendation coefficient is 1.2.2)At the control unit level,there are 10 losses and 9 profits in 19 units.Part of the loss-making plots will increase the floor area ratio or increase the development of profitable land.3)At the level of the block site,taking the overall renovation project of the Karma Gangsang Community as an example,the original plan has the highest cost and no profitable income,so it is not operational.Among the two new comparison schemes,Scheme A is better for input-output benefits,and priority is given to implementation.