The Research Of Environmental Regulation And Provincial Industrial Green Productivity

Since the Reform and Opening-up Chinese economy has experienced more than 30 years of rapid growth,but the traditional extensive growth mode has also brought increasingly tight energy constraints and serious environmental pollution.Chinese industry is big but not strong,is much but not excellent,on the whole has not yet got rid of high input,high energy consumption,high emissions of traditional extensive growth mode.This paper defines industrial green productivity as the ability of the economy to realize industrial growth and sustainable development using all the factors of production,including energy,environment,labor,capital,technology,land,etc.,so how to improve industrial green productivity is the key to realize the green transformation and sustainable development of our economy.On the basis of the existing research,this paper analyzes the transmission mechanism of environmental regulation affecting green productivity and the interaction between decision-making units.From the perspective of dual constraints of resource and environment,energy is used as input variable,carbon emissions and pollutant emissions are used as undesirable output,the global super-efficient SBM model is used to measure the industrial green productivity of 31 provinces and cities in mainland China from 1999 to 2015.This paper establish the space Durbin model and use industrial green productivity as the explanatory variable,regressional analysis cost-type environmental regulation’s and investment-type environmental regulation’s impact on industrial green productivity.The empirical results show that:(1)From 1997 to 2015,the industrial green productivity of 31 provinces and cities in mainland China increased,and the increase rate in the eastern region was higher than that in the northeastern region,the central region and the western region.(2)In addition to Guangdong,Tianjin,Beijing in 2015,the rest of the provinces and cities are industrial green production inefficient.(3)The internal differentiation degree of industrial green productivity in 31 provinces and cities in 2015 is higher than in 2008,higher than 1999.(4)Investment-type environmental regulation’s effect on industrial green productivity is significantly positive,and cost-type environmental regulation’s effect on industrial green productivity is significantly negative.Based on the above conclusions,this paper puts forward the corresponding policy recommendations:(1)To speed up the transformation of industrial growth mode,improve the utilization capacity of existing resources by improving management ability and technical level,so that industrial growth from extensive growth mode to intensive growth mode.(2)To improve the intensity of investment-type environmental regulation,and firmly establish the protection of the ecological environment is to protect productivity,improve the ecological environment is to improve the concept of productivity,improve the environmental access threshold.(3)To reform and innovate existing environmental regulatory content,create and use more market-oriented policy tools that enables pollution "externalization of internalization".