| With the improvement of people’s living standards,people’s demand for the aesthetic landscape of the tourist landscape in sensory,psychological and spiritual aspects is becoming more and more important.The city pays more and more attention to the construction of unique tourist attractions and plays the characteristic tourist label,but because of the aesthetics of the landscape The neglect of value has formed a "thousand-city side" with a similar landscape framework and lack of cultural connotation.The urban landscape lacks the support of regional culture and appears to be single and lacks features.Therefore,the aesthetic value is integrated into the landscape planning to create a distinctive urban landscape environment.Lanzhou is a new industrial city and central city in the upper reaches of the Yellow River.It is a typical ribbon city.From the west to the east,the Yellow River traverses the urban area.The city and the countryside are interlaced between the north and south mountains and the Yellow River valley,and the mountains and rivers form the "two mountains and one river" urban landscape.Therefore,it is of practical significance to study the aesthetics of the waterfront landscape of the Yellow River customs line.This paper takes Lanzhou Huang he Customs Line as the research object,and investigates the current situation along the Yellow River through field research,and analyzes the problems of different sections in terms of naturalness,diversity and history:(1)Uneven and uneven distribution of green space in urban areas The overall greening of the Yellow River section of Cheng guan is monotonous and obsolete;(2)some rivers are artificially over-exposed,the landscape is single,and the hydrophilic is poor;(3)the construction of some sections is too high,the roads are green and dense,and the openness is poor;(4)the distribution of scenic spots Extremely uneven,lack of characteristic cultural theme parks,single sequence of landscapes,lack of overall planning;(5)construction of modern facilities along part of the line,destroying the original historical features,lacking historical and cultural landscapes;(6)chaotic skylines in some areas,idle land,buildings The style is not compatible with the surrounding environment,and the coordination is poor.(7)The crowded traffic and noisy environment interfere with the tourists’ viewing and viewing of the landscape;(8)The tourist facilities along the line are scarce,the north and south of the Yellow River are not smooth,and the traffic facilities are seriously inadequate.Then according to the status quo analysis,the entire Yellow River customs line is divided into four study area.In the study area,a questionnaire survey was conducted on these four study areas to analyze the willingness of tourists to pay compensation for different aesthetic characteristics of the Yellow River.(1)The aesthetic value of tourists to the Yellow River customs line WTP willing to pay is 20.08yuan/a,tourists to the Yellow River The aesthetic value of WTP in the east and west sections along the line is higher,and the willingness to pay for the study area is: 21.29yuan/a,19.86 yuan/a,18.29 yuan/a,20.91yuan/a;(2)tourists’ aesthetic characteristics of different sections along the Yellow River.The willingness to compensate is different;the highest willingness to pay for the entire study area is diversity,followed by suitability,naturalness and historicity;(3)Visitors have the highest willingness to compensate for the aesthetic characteristics of the four study areas.This paper selects six aesthetic characteristics such as naturalness,diversity and uniqueness.Based on SBE,it evaluates the landscape photos with characteristics along the line,and combines its quantitative indicators to study and analyze the aesthetic value of the Yellow River customs line.The main conclusions are as follows:(1)There are differences in the standardized scores of different aesthetic characteristics between the samples selected within the Yellow River and even within the sample.The historical evaluation scores of Baitashan Park,Zhongshan Bridge and Baiyunguan were higher;the samples of Xujiashan Park and Xiliugou farmland landscape were higher in nature;the aesthetic characteristics of the sidewalks of Yan’an District and Yantan Yellow River Bridge were lower;Baiyun In addition to the historical significance of the Notre Dame Palace,the evaluation scores of other aesthetic features are lower.(2)Evaluation of each aesthetic feature The high and low values of the standardized score are distributed in different study areas.The high values of naturalness and uniqueness are located in Xujiashan Park in the fourth study area;historical high values are concentrated in the research area of the old city culture;the lowest value of natural and openness is distributed in the research area III;the lowest coordination The value of the study area moved to the nine-day Madonna Palace on the east side of the Xisha Yellow River Bridge.(3)The landscape pattern index is significantly correlated with the corresponding aesthetic characteristics and landscape aesthetic evaluation values at the 0.05 or 0.01 level.There was a significant positive correlation between naturalness and vegetation coverage,and positive correlation with natural and artificial landscape area ratio;openness and building density were significantly negatively correlated;diversity and landscape component complexity were significantly positively correlated with SHDI;landscape aesthetic evaluation value It is positively correlated with vegetation coverage and landscape composition complexity and SHDI;it is negatively correlated with building density;but it is not high with LPI,natural and artificial landscape area.(4)The highest and lowest standardization of landscape aesthetic evaluation are located in the study area.The highest standard of landscape aesthetic evaluation along the Yellow River is Baitashan Park 5.99,the lowest value is Mingcheng Square-5.04,all located in the study area 3;the lowest value in the study area is 3.56 in Xisha Park,the lowest value is 9 days in Notre Dame-1.55;The highest value is 3.12 in Matan Wetland Park,the lowest is-3.54 in Anning District Revetment Walk;the highest value in Research Area 4 is 2.89 in Xujiashan Park,and the lowest is-3.81 in the east of Donggang Yellow River Bridge.Through investigation and analysis of the current aesthetic characteristics and aesthetic value of the Yellow River,it is suggested that the planning and construction of the Yellow River Customs line should focus on diversity,naturalness,suitability and historicity,and according to the existing problems of the urban landscape along the line,Several strategies are proposed for the improvement of the aesthetic value of the Yellow River customs line. |
PDF Full Text Request