Font Size: a A A

The Operation Of The Research About One Project One Discussion Financial Premium And Subsidy System

Posted on:2017-04-15Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X ChenFull Text:PDF
GTID:2349330512956905Subject:Agricultural Extension
Abstract/Summary:
The "One project one discussion" financial premium and subsidy system is a specific product along with the reform of taxes and fees in our rural areas, to resolve the village public goods supply problem, constantly improve the level of production and living in rural areas in our country, rural governance innovation. The system started relatively late in Neijiang downtown district, has not yet formed a complete theoretical system and the system specification, on the Neijiang area the "one project one discussion" financial premium and subsidy system operation, is advantageous to the innovation of democratic discussion methods, improve the villagers’ autonomy ability, help to improve the rural infrastructure construction, improve the level of peasants production and living.In this paper, in the form of questionnaire, interview and visit investigation, understand and master the Neijiang area "one project one discussion" financial premium and subsidy system operation conditions, using relevant theory and literature, profoundly summed up the system running results obtained, the existing problems and the reasons, and by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to get hierarchy total sorts, by "one project one discussion" financial premium repair work in Hebei province from 2012 to 2015, one of the pilot provinces rural initial value evaluation indexes as the Neijiang area "one project one discussion" financial premium and subsidy system running effect evaluation index for the initial value of the reference standard evaluation index weighted standardization of standardized scores and total score, in order to "one project one discussion" from the Neijiang area financial premium and subsidy system running effect evaluation. And put forward the perfect according to the results of the survey and evaluation system run at the practice level of operational counter-measures and Suggestions.Through the visit, the survey found the Neijiang area "one project one discussion" financial premium and subsidy system since 2012, to a certain extent, improve the rural infrastructure construction, promote the rural economic development, arouse the enthusiasm of the villagers build public welfare undertakings. But due to the shortage of the system design itself, such as irrational financing limit standard,replacing the labor with money conversion standard is low; Problems in the operation of the system of publicity is not in place, the masses participate in actively, village-level government ability is limited and so on reasons, lead to the villagers, project financing raise, irregularities are common, project follow-up management does not reach the designated position, inconsistent results evaluation and effect evaluation system itself various problem, make the system run it is difficult to achieve the desired effect. Using the analytic hierarchy process, based on the index selection of systemic, objectivity and operational principles, reference to related literature, constructed the Neijiang area "one project one discussion"financial premium and subsidy system running effect evaluation index system, selection of funds pull effect on the policy, economic benefits and social benefits, health, environmental governance effect 4 first-level indicators and 12 secondary indicators. Through the determination of index weight, found that the weight of level index of social benefit is as high as 0.4824, the most significant effect on the system operation performance, policy funds pull effects. Secondary index hierarchy total sorts, according to the results of highway mileage rate is the most significant effect on the system operation performance, level the sorting weight is 0.2272; financial premium effects on capital must supplement in system operation times, sort hierarchy total weight of 0.1749. System running effect concrete evaluation results show that the relative pilot provinces, Hebei province, the Neijiang area "one project one discussion" financial premium and subsidy system running effect evaluation standardization of total score of 75.31 points, just reached a good level. But the growth rate of rural road mileage, local fund matching rate, financial investment multiplier standardized score evaluation indexes were 37.05 points,58.87 points. 28.54 points, compared with the Hebei province, "one project one discussion" in Neijiang city financial premium supplement their road project construction, fill place prize money matching rate is low, the magnitude of the construction of resource integration and other public welfare undertakings. Existing problems and the reasons for system operation, this paper puts forward Suggestions on five aspects:raise law through perfecting the financing way, innovation the villagers to make a further optimization design; By expanding policy propaganda, strengthen the training and study make each participation main body gets system operation optimization; Through overall prize repair project arrangement, integration of construction of village-level public welfare resources to highlight social benefits and policy funds pulling effect; By strengthening the supervision and administration of project operation and improve the project funds management, optimization of the assessment of project work, make the system run further strengthen supervision and evaluation mechanism; Through increased investment in project follow-up funds of the management, strengthening the management of project follow-up to make the system run the subsequent management mechanism will be further improved.
Keywords/Search Tags:One project one discussion, Financial premium and subsidy, The operation of the system, Neijiang downtown district, Analytic hierarchy process
Related items