| After the victory of the Anti-Japanese War,centrist democrats actively set up progressive publications and used newspapers and periodicals to express political appeal.Under the guidance of the mutual opposition between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party's party newspapers,the mediation of relatively neutral media has become an important public opinion force after the victory of the Anti-Japanese War.Among them,the Democracy weekly magazine,as a public opinion forum of the China Association for the Promotion of Democracy,devotes its urgent desire for democracy and peace to investing in the trend of running newspapers.The Democracy weekly tried to act as a mediator between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party,demanding a democratic constitutional government,calling for a halt to the civil war,and conducting public opinion guidance on important social issues.The paper tried to statistically analyze the newspapers of the 54 editions of the Democracy Weekly,and based on this,it conducted a textual analysis of the Democracy weekly,which outlined the main directions of the Democracy Weekly public opinion guidance.As an example,the report of the“portal massacre”contrasted horizontally with Xinhua Daily 's,Central Daily.and tried to show the focus and difference between the centrists and the Chinese Communists and the Kuomintang in guiding public opinion.The text of the paper is divided into four parts.The first chapter first introduced the differences between the Kuomintang,the Chinese Communists,and the centrist on the path of nation-building.The Kuomintang tried to maintain its dictatorship.The Chinese Communist Party advocated the establishment of a multi-party coalition government.The centrists tried to reconcile the conflict between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party and advocated democratic peace.The radically different lines of founding the three countries are also doomed to their differences in the guidance of public opinion.Secondly,this chapter introduced in detail the basic situation of the Democracy weekly magazine,including the contents of the layout,the team of the editorial board,and the relationship with the China Association for the Promotion of Democracy.Through analysis,it has been found that the main founders of the Democracy weekly include Zheng Zhenduo,Ma Xulun,and Zhou Jianren.It is a member of the China Association for the Promotion of Democracy,and the China Democratic Association is a middle-distance political party.The Democracy weekly is the public opinion propaganda position of the China Association for the Promotion of Democracy.In the second chapter,taking the report of "The Case of the Jiaochangkou Massacre" in the Democracy,Xinhua Daily and Central Daily as an example,we tried to show the differences in the three news reports.First of all,the statistics of the three newspapers' reports on the " Jiaochangkou massacre" can be found.Xinhua Daily has the highest proportion of news reports on the "compared to the situation of the Jiaochangkou massacre,,and the Central Daily tries to avoid involving more information on "comparisons." The news of the "portal massacre" was reported,and the proportion of the Democracy Weekly report was between the two.Secondly,this chapter also analyzes the texts of three newspapers on the basis of statistical data.Xinhua Daily focuses on the purpose of attacking the national government by showing the truth of the "Jiaochangkou massacre." The Central Daily distorted the truth.The way of reporting was diametrically opposed to Xinhua Daily,and the Democracy weekly focused on urging the National Government to take effective measures to prevent similar incidents from happening again.The third chapter analyzes the main content of the Democracy weekly.Firstly,a total of 719 articles in the 54th edition of Democracy weekly newspapers are collected for statistical data.According to the results of statistical data,the guideline of Democracy weekly magazine is divided into Four parts:Opposition to the one-party dictatorship calls for a democratic constitutional government;Call for the KMT to negotiate and stop the civil war;The Nationalist government cracks down on the patriotic movement to create bloodshed;Other social issues include international issues,unemployment,official corruption,exchange of counterfeit banknotes,education and prices,etc..Through the textual analysis of the four aspects of the democracy weekly media guidance,we can see the direction,focus and main content of the democracy weekly public opinion guidance.On the basis of the foregoing,Chapter 4 summarizes the influence and insufficiency of the public opinion propaganda of the Democracy Weekly.The progressive performance of the Democratic Weekly has always stood in the people's position,which represents the interests of the people and represents the Chinese democracy.Progressive people have the responsibility to take on the feelings of home and country.Their news reports truly reflect their social life.The lack of Democracy weekly is reflected in the depth of its news coverage and the breadth of public opinion guidance.The Democracy weekly has always had expectations of the Kuomintang and failed to recognize the national government's false peace and true civil war.This has led to insufficient depth of news coverage.The Democracy weekly magazine did not have the backing of powerful financial groups and organizations,but also destined for its own vulnerability,making it somewhat lacking in the breadth of public opinion guidance.In the one year after the victory of the Anti-Japanese War,Democracy weekly guided its political demands through its own public opinion.It issued its own voice on important issues such as reconciling the conflict between the KMT and the CPC,calling for a halt to the civil war,and the establishment of a peaceful country.This is an important guide for mediation by the mediationists.component. |
PDF Full Text Request