| In the era of big data,no one can escape,time and space are being seen through,and figures construct stereoscopic portrait of everyone.With the rapid development of large data technology,the phenomenon of personal information is frequently abused,the public awareness of information security is increasingly strengthened,and the protection of personal information is being paid more and more attention.Since the Right to be forgotten was officially recognized by the European Court of justice since 2014,countries have different attitudes towards it because of many factors such as national conditions and history.The number and scope of research on it have been significantly increased and broadened.There is no detailed practice standard for it.It only lists the "exceptions" of wide range of it,including works of art,news works,etc.The individual information that the information subject requires to delete is in some sense the category of the Right to learn the truth and the freedom of speech.The Right to learn the truth and the freedom of speech belong to the basic rights of the Constitution and the law in many countries.The information controller also increases the work and power of the censorship of information except the "delete" obligation,and this "review" Power is a challenge to the public's the Right to learn the truth and freedom of expression,so the practice of the Right to be forgotten has been tested in many ways.The circulation and dissemination of information depend on the spread of news,the news advocating freedom of speech and the important channel for the masses to enjoy the Right to learn the truth,but the practice standard of the Right to be forgotten is still unsettled,and the practice of news dissemination is also more passive,and is challenged in many ways.The news credibility is the first to bear the brunt,for example,the data news "source" has the possibility of being deleted by the Right to be forgotten."The source" contains the original collection information of the data news,the accuracy of the original information is questioned directly to the value of the news itself,the credibility of the news is unavoidable.The information protection advocated is also in conflict with the freedom of the press.The data retrieval,analysis and processing depend on the computer,and the computer algorithm is unavoidable.The filtering of the news content should also consider the division of the media or the goodcontent.All kinds of related factors will increase the Right to be forgotten.Practice difficulties widen the gap between theory and practice.In addition,the Right to be forgotten endows the information controller with the role of "trial",but the motivation and level of "censorship" of information controllers is difficult to quantify.The executor of the the Right to be forgotten,the grey zone of the practice of the information controller,implies a lot of possibilities,or the fear of external pressure or strict control,and the quality of the practice results is difficult to guarantee.The practice of the Right to be forgotten must follow the requirements of the information subject,but the value identification and processing of the relevant information should be first to maintain public interests,safeguard the public's the Right to learn the truth and maintain freedom of speech.When implementing the Right to be forgotten,the information controller can draw on the suggestions of the news communication practitioners.All information controllers or their employees who are employed in the practice of the Right to be forgotten should have basic news and media literacy.The "use exceptions" of the Right to be forgotten need to be refined,set up a certain elastic space or can be used in a fractional order,to deal with the relevant information in the way of "maximizing interest",even if it contains the processing of the news works,if the meaning of the reservation is greater than the meaning of the deletion or the opposite,we should choose the lighter one. |
PDF Full Text Request