Font Size: a A A

The Research Of Object In Advance Pattern In Historical Records

Posted on:2019-03-12Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:M ZhangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2335330563954533Subject:Chinese Language and Literature
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
“object in advance”first proposed by Li Jinxi,then some scholars used this term in their writings,such as Lv Shuxiang,Sun Xixin,Zhu Wenxian and so on,but scholars who specifically studied“object in advance pattern”currently have only the Zhu Wenxian.This article re-defines the “object in advance pattern”according to the its features.The sentences whitch object is in advanced to the verbs or prepositions are collectively referred to as “object in advance pattern”,so that it is convenient for us to study the special object word order in “Historical Records”.This thesis exhaustively collects the “object in advance” language in “Historical Records”,and divided them into two categories: marked “object in advance pattern” and unmarked “object in advance pattern”.Marked “object in advance pattern”including:“object in advance pattern”marked by interrogative pronouns;“object in advance pattern”marked by privative;“object in advance pattern”marked by ? / ?;“object in advance pattern”marked by diposal construction.Through inspection and analysis,the following conclusions are drawn:There are 12 interrogative pronouns in“Historical Records”,The “ ? ” is used most frequently,There are 213“object in advance pattern”marked by interrogative pronouns,the proportion is approximately 87.3%,there are 31 interrogative pronoun's object in postposition,the proportion is approximately 12.7%,From this,it can be seen that interrogative pronouns are still used as objects before,although there are some cases of postposition,but the proportion of postpositions is not large.There are 29 “object in advance pattern”marked by privative in“Historical Records”,the proportion is 50%,There are 29 object in postposition marked by privative,the proportion is 50%,The proportion of theobject in postposition in the negative sentence of“Historical Records” has increased significantly,but the proportion of the “object in advance” is still have a half.Most of the object in the negative sentence is the pronoun,including the first person pronoun,the third person pronoun and the demonstrative pronoun.There are 42“object in advance pattern”marked by“?”and 16“object in advance pattern”marked by“?”in“Historical Records”,There also are 14“object in advance pattern”marked by diposal construction“?”,Including 13“?+O1+V+(?)+O2”and 1“?+O1+V+(?)+??”pattern.“object in advance pattern”in“Historical Records”,whether it is the pronoun object or the noun object,the causes of advancement are related to the focus expression.The advance object has the effect of emphasizing,and the advance of the pronoun object is also related to the attachment.Interrogative pronoun's object in postposition in“Historical Records”is related to the features of the predicate collocation.In general,a word“?”or a class judgment word“?”are generally placed behind.Some of the expressions have tended to be fixed,such as“??”“??”“??”and so on,these collocations are in postposition in“Historical Records”.Interrogative pronoun's object in postposition is related to their negative words.
Keywords/Search Tags:“Historical Records”, “object in advance pattern”, focus, word order
PDF Full Text Request
Related items