A Comparative Study On The Competitiveness Of Culture Manufacture Of Beijing,Tianjin And Hebei,Yangtze River Delta And Pearl River Delta

Cultural industries as sunrise industry are crucial to promoting the development of the national economy.As a basic industry of culture industry,cultural manufacture is an important support for the development of cultural service and cultural wholesale and retail trade.The development of cultural manufacture is a powerful measure to realize the strategy of a strong cultural country,achieve economic transformation and upgrading,and build a new pattern of China’s economic development.However,the current development of China’s cultural manufacture has regional problems such as unbalanced development and weak innovation capability.Therefore,this article takes"culture manufacture" as the research object and uses factor analysis to compare the competitiveness of the three major regions of Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei,Yangtze River Delta,and Pearl River Delta.Based on this,the causes of the differences in the competitiveness of the cultural manufacture in the three major regions of the Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei,the Yangtze River Delta,and the Pearl River Delta Region are analyzed,with a view to providing decision-making basis for promoting the development of the cultural manufacture.This paper compares the competitiveness of the three major regions cultural manufacture from the three dimensions-development potential,growth rate and efficiency.Then,on the basis of the three dimensions,we make a comprehensive evaluation of the’ competitiveness of the three major regions cultural manufacture according to the proportion of variance.The results show that:(1)Development potential:in the three major regions,the Pearl River Delta has the greatest potential for development,followed by the Yangtze River Delta,while the region of Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei,is relatively weak;from the perspective of the development potential of the three major regional cultural manufacture,the fluctuations in development potential from 2012 to 2016 are not significant;in terms of provinces and cities,Guangdong,Jiangsu,and Shandong provinces have ranked in the top three regions.(2)Dimension of the growth rate:the empirical results show that the fastest growth rate is in the Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei region,followed by the Yangtze River Delta,and finally the PearlRiver Delta.Contrary to the ranking of development potential factors,the few provinces with the slowest growth rate happen to be development.The three provinces with the greatest potential are Guangdong,Jiangsu and Shandong provinces.(3)Dimensions of efficiency evaluation:The development efficiency of the cultural manufacture in the three regions is the best in the Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei region,followed by the Yangtze River Delta region,and finally the Pearl River Delta region.(4)As a result of the comprehensive evaluation of the competitiveness of the three regional cultural manufacturing industries,the Pearl River Delta region has the strongest comprehensive competitiveness,followed by the Yangtze River Delta region,and the Beijing,Tianjin and-Hebei region has the weakest comprehensive competitiveness.On this basis,based on the quasi-diamond model and the theory of cultural industry competitiveness,this article analyzes the factors affecting the manufacturing competitiveness of the three major regions from the perspective of factor input,using multiple regression models.The regression results show that the number of employees in cultural manufacture has the greatest impact on the added value of cultural manufacture.Fixed asset investment is another important factor that affects the development of cultural manufacture in addition to the factors of labor force.R&D investment and financial support compete for cultural manufacture,the impact of force is weak,and the number of corporate units in cultural manufacture has the weakest impact on the competitiveness of cultural manufacture.According to the empirical results of this paper,suggestions are proposed to promote the development of cultural manufacturing from four perspectives:(1)to strengthen personnel training and improve professional accomplishment;(2)to increase investment in science and technology and improve absorption and transformation ability;(3)to deepen the system reform and improve the efficiency of policy input;(4)to utilize the advantage of location to improve the industrial agglomeration effect.