A Study On The Arbitrariness Of Confucianism And Mohism And Taoist And Legalists In The Pre-Qin

Arbitrariness is a basic commonality of confuciansm and mohist and taoism and legalism. Arbitrariness mainly has the following three characteristics: firstly,it is non-critical; that is entirely sure their ideas, irrational criticism of the assertions of others; the secondly,it is unique, that is considered to be the only spokesman for the sole bearers of truth and historical mission; thirdly,it is exclusive, that is rejection of the other claims, or even to eliminate the assertions of others. These three features are mutually different but interrelated, which is to determine whether a doctrine arbitrariness of the main criteria. In the academic attitude, academic purposes, Peace and Prosperity on the way, Qin Confucianism, ink, Taoism and ideas are showing sharp arbitrariness.In the academic attitude, Qin Confucianism, ink, Taoism and thought has shown a strong non-critical, uniqueness and exclusivity. They believe that their theory is absolutely correct, unquestionable. In their view, their own, and only his doctrine of Jesus Christ is not easy, universal truth, the other theory is a fallacy. In criticizing the ideas of others and respond to the challenge or criticism from others, they often do not give the other side of the problem, theory, evidence these angles response, but arbitrarily that the other side is wrong, convinced that he was right, even hoping all kinds of authority to destroy the other's thoughts. In the academic purpose of the pre-Qin Confucianism, ink, Taoism and showing a strong ideological Uniqueness and exclusivity. They shared a flat for the purpose of governing the world, but they all think they are the only person in the world of Mercedes-Benz, it is the sole bearer of this historical mission. In their view, people are not enough to assume the historical responsibility. On Statecraft way, Qin Confucianism, ink, Taoism and the same thought has shown a distinct uniqueness and exclusivity. They emphasize the role of the state machinery to unilateral monarch as the core of society, hoping the despotic power to transform society from top to bottom, neglect and exclusion of people with the ability to participate in social rights matters; in the use of royal power in the process, they are I want to be the only means of kingship who have advocated banning other ideological doctrine combined with royal road to let your mind become the dominant social ideology, and thus the transformation of society from top to bottom. Critical and non-exclusive academic attitude, academic purpose and uniqueness and exclusivity on Statecraft way, so Qin Confucianism, ink, Taoism and have a distinct ideological arbitrariness.Understanding Qin Confucianism and Taoism and factions thinkers shared arbitrariness, it helps us to recognize characteristics of the times Chinese traditional mainstream thinking, help understand the relationship between China and the traditional academic autocratic powers between the traditional culture will help us critical inheritance today.