The Research Of Intervention Effect For HP Infection Patients By Oral Scaling Intervention

ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical symptom score?histopathological under gastroscope score?¹⁴C–UBT positive grading value?reduce HP infection rate?¹⁴C–UBT positive rate of infection HP patients by different methods,to approach the influence of the clinical symptom score?histopathological score under gastroscope?reduce HP infection rate?¹⁴C–UBT positive rate by oral scaling Intervention for patients,the HP eradication rate of patients were increased for providing reliable theoretical basis.MethodsThe clinical data of 120 cases patients for oral cavity?stomach simultaneous infection HP in our hospital from 2016.8 to 2017.8 were analyzed,which were to be divided into two group by random paper method,control group?stomach Intervention quadruple therapy?61 cases,Intervention group?stomach Intervention quadruple therapy combined with clean governance intervention?59 cases.General data of patients were detected by self-made general situation questionnaire,clinical symptom score?histopathological under gastroscope score were evaluated by questionnaire survey,the reduce HP infection rate?¹⁴C–UBT positive rate after Intervention were detected.The measurement data arrange was arranged and questionnaire was collected,database was builded by SPSS 20.0,General information were description research,Continuous variable of normal distribution were express by x±s,measurement data of skewness distribution were express by median?four quantile spacing,through single factor analysis of variance and T test analysis,enumeration data were?2 test,the clinical symptom score?histopathological under gastroscope score?¹⁴C–UBT positive grading value before oral scaling Intervention and after oral scaling Intervention were repeated measures,¹⁴C–UBT positive grading value and clinical symptom score?histopathological under gastroscope score were two variables correlation analyzed,reduce HP infection rate?¹⁴C–UBT positive rate were?2 test.Results1?The difference of two group HP positive patients clinical symptom score before Intervention were no statistical significance?P>0.05?.2?The difference of two group HP positive patients histopathological under gastroscope score before Intervention were no statistical significance?P>0.05?.3?The difference of clinical symptom score?histopathological under gastroscope score?¹⁴C–UBT positive grading value in two group were statistical significance,the difference of clinical symptom score?histopathological under gastroscope score?¹⁴C–UBT positive grading value before intervene and after intervene were statistical significance?P<0.05?,the before intervene?after intervene and intervene method were certain interaction.4?The ¹⁴C–UBT positive grading value and clinical symptom score?histopathologicalundergastroscopescoreweresignificantpositive correlation,the difference were statistical significance?P<0.05?.5?The reduce HP infection rate?¹⁴C–UBT positive rate of Intervention group patients were lower than control group,the difference were statistical significance?P<0.05?.Conclusions1?clinical symptom?histopathological under gastroscope of patients are improvedby oral scaling Intervention.2?The ¹⁴C–UBT positive grading value and clinical symptom score?histopathological under gastroscope score are significant positive correlation.3?The reduce HP infection rate?¹⁴C–UBT positive rate by oral scaling Intervention could decrease.