Clinical Study On Treatment Of Lumbar Muscle Strain With Blood Stasis By Pricking Cupping

ObjectiveLumbar muscle strain,refers to the exogenous,internal injuries or sitting incorrectly,the waist is forced improperly,breath frustration led to poor waist blood run,the urgency or loss of care caused by the waist side or both sides or the middle of the pain The main symptoms of a disease card,but also see other parts of the discomfort to the chest,back,the Ministry of the Ministry,the abdomen,calf and feet and see not suitable for more common.Low back pain in the waist,and kidney and foot sun bladder,foot Shaoyin kidney,Ren Chongdu and other meridians are closely related to the initial hair is mostly evidence,can feel cold and dampness,damp heat and other evils and fall servant trauma Cause,disease for a long time to kidney is the most common.Regardless of exogenous internal injuries,the total kidney-based,down the servant dash or dampness,hot and humid evil for its incentive.As a common clinical disease,this study through the use of blood cupping therapy for patients with stasis type lumbar muscle strain,to observe the blood cupping on the blood stasis type lumbar muscle strain symptoms intervention.In this study,patients with lumbar muscle strain were more common in clinical practice.Through the use of blood cupping for multiple bloodletting therapy,to explore the feasibility of the application of blood cupping in lumbar muscle strain of blood stasis.MethodsSixty patients with lumbar muscle strain were randomly divided into two groups:treatment group and control group(30 cases).The treatment group was mainly treated with acupuncture and cupping,and the control group was treated with acupuncture alone.After the treatment,the VAS score of lumbar muscle strain pain was analyzed.The data of the two groups were analyzed statistically to explore the effects of lancet-The clinical efficacy of lumbar muscle strain.ResultsAfter 2 courses of treatment,there were 3 patients(10.0%)in the treatment group,13 cases(43.3%)with significant effect,11 cases(36.7%)effective,3 cases(10.0%),The total effective rate was 90.0%.In the control group,1 patient(3.33%)recovered,8(26.7%),13(43.4%)and 8(26.7%),with a total effective rate of 73.3%.(P<0.05),indicating that the treatment group was better than the control group.