Study Of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies And Intervention Of Aggressive And Impulsive Behavior In Ecological Immigrant Children

Objective Firstly, To compare the difference of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and impulsive behavior in eco-immigrant and original places children, analyzing which the dimensions of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and parental rearing style related to impulsive behavior in two groups. Secondly, by comparing the difference of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and aggressive behavior in eco-immigrant and original place children, analyzing which the dimensions of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and parental rearing style related to aggressive behavior in two groups. Lastly, exploring the effects of group cognitive behavior therapy to impulsive and aggressive behavior in ecological immigrant children.Methods In part one, we use Barratt Impulsiveness Scale(BIS-11), Parental Bonding Instrument(PBI) and cognitive emotion regulation scale(CERQ)in 755 participants from ecological immigrant adolescents and 706 from original place. To analysis the differences of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and impulsive behavior between eco-immigrant children and original places children by control study. By comparing different genders of cognitive emotion regulation strategies, family rearing styles and impulsive behavior in eco-immigrant children, to understand the characteristics of impulsive behavior in eco-immigrant children. Exploring the relations of family rearing styles and cognitive emotion regulation strategies with impulsive, hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the effects of these related factors on impulsive behavior. In part two, we use Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire(BPAQ) to analysis the differences of aggressive behavior between two groups and comparing different genders of aggressive behavior in eco-immigrant children, to understand the characteristics of aggressive behavior in eco-immigrant and original place children. Exploring the relations of family rearing styles and cognitive emotion regulation strategies with aggressive behavior, hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the effects of these related factors on aggression behavior. In part three, select the 60 children of total scores in impulsive and aggressive behavior above percentile 92% to participate group cognitive behavior therapy(GCBT), comparing the differences of impulsive behavior, aggressive behavior, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies scores between baseline and after intervention.Results 1. A comparison between eco-immigrant and original place children showed eco-immigrant children use more cognitive emotion regulation strategies of self-blame(t=2.35,P<0.05), acceptance(t=5.02,P<0.01), positive reappraisal(t=2.40,P<0.05), putting into perspective(t=3.35,P<0.01), catastrophizing(t=4.44,P<0.01) and other-blame(t=2.63,P<0.05). Eco-immigrant children has a higher risk of abscence of plan impulsive behavior(t=3.12,P<0.01).There are differences of gender in parental rearing style of eco-immigrant children, the level of boy was higher than girl on the parental rearing style of parents control and encouraged, the level of boy was higher than girl on the strategies of refocus on planning putting into perspective, positive refocusing and catastrophizing. Life satisfaction(β=- 0.11,t=-2.84,P<0.01), father control(β=0.22,t=3.18,P<0.01)and mother care(β=- 0.13,t=-3.75,P<0.01)were found to be significant predictor of impulsive behaviors. In cognitive emotion regulation strategies, acceptance(β=- 0.13,t=-3.06,P<0.01)and catastrophizing(β=0.22,t=4.65,P<0.01)were found to be significant predictor of impulsive behaviors. 2.Eco-immigrant children has a higher risk of physical aggressive( t=2.49, P<0.05), hostility( t=2.40,P<0.05) and self-directed aggressive behavior(t=3.64,P<0.01). The level of boy was higher than girl on the physical attacks, verbal aggression and total aggressive behavior. Willingness reverse migration(β=0.08,t=2.16,P<0.01), father control(β=0.24, t=3.50, P<0.01) and mother care(β=-0.13, t=-3.75,P<0.01)were found to be significant predictor of aggressive behaviors. In cognitive emotion regulation strategies, rumination(β=0.10,t=2.07,P<0.05) and other-blame(β= 0.10,t=2.09,P<0.05) were found to be significant predictor of aggressive behaviors. 3.After the group cognitive behavior therapy, the scores of the impulsive and aggressive behavior is less than baseline in eco-immigrant children, group cognitive behavioral therapy can significantly increase the eco-immigrant children using positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies.Conclusion Firstly, eco-immigrant children have a high risk of impulsive behavior than origin place, suggesting that positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies and parental care parenting style help reduce the incidence of impulsive behaviors in ecological immigrant children. Secondly, eco-immigrant children have a high risk of aggressive behavior than origin place, suggesting that positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies and parental care parenting style help reduce the incidence of aggressive behaviors in ecological immigrant children. Thirdly, group cognitive behavior therapy could significantly increase the ecological immigrant children using positive cognitive emotion regulation strategies,and reduce the incidence of impulsive and aggressive behavior.