| From the late 1980 s, European countries deregulation and integration of capital markets malicious M& A wave, the notorious capital flows in the late 90 s, the southeast Asian financial crisis, to the financial system in 2008 "innovation" of the financial crisis spread around the world, not only make the corporate governance and accountability has become a household word, Europe and the US business community and policy makers a profound understanding of the corporate governance system is weak macroeconomic impact and potential long-term consequences. Another twenty years from domestic environmental damage and pollution incidents frequently in the past, to a non-faith conduct in recent years, along with a spate of governance failure events, more so that people have on corporate governance and policy development will have a profound questioned. Academics reflect on the effectiveness of existing corporate governance system, but also began to explore new areas of corporate governance- stakeholder governance and broader accountability(also known as the modern corporate governance).Currently there is no system to explain the academic achievement of corporate social responsibility governance. Elaborate domestic researchers from the macro-economic, legal, ethical, etc., discusses the internal relations of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility and the difference, is about the empirical analysis the main corporate governance and social responsibility performance or the relation between social responsibility information disclosure and so on. Corporate social responsibility management influence on the performance of social responsibilities of related theory is not perfect.Therefore, this article from the basic theory of corporate governance defect analysis, multiple integration theory of corporate governance built into modern corporate governance structure and elements of the proposed areas, based on the perspective of social responsibility and the broader accountability, and to explore more extensive environmental factors affecting the introduction of the theoretical basis of corporate governance, the structure of the prototype of the modern corporate governance and inductive reasoning carried out of the system. Analysis shows that social responsibility theory fusion governance model does more to make up for the agent-oriented corporate governance deficiencies. And social responsibility governance structure and elements built on the model, but also a broader corporate governance practices to guide management thinking logical framework, and therefore social and corporate governance practice self-discipline to provide theoretical guidance. Based on the above theoretical model,select six of social responsibility typical Chinese enterprises, using standardized verification of multiple case studies, multi-faceted secondary data collection, to govern the proposed elements of the above levels from the internal governance and external governance levels(stakeholders and social expectations) were analyzed, and then the proposed theoretical model to demonstrate corporate social responsibility governance elements came to the conclusion after argument(the system of governance and ethical governance). Conclusions are as follows: internal governance dimensions: institutional governance and ethical elements of governance elements of the shareholders, the Board of Supervisors; external governance levels of stakeholders and society(expectation): senior managers, employees, customers / consumers,suppliers competitors, Competitors, NGO / NPO, the system of governance and ethical elements of government control elements, human rights, community, environment, were validated get.Then using exploratory case method, based on the above validation elements to explore the influence on the performance of social responsibilities, the following results: the company’s internal governance mainly positive impact factors of liability management performance and market performance of shareholders; Stakeholders mainly positive impact factors of liability management performance, social performance and environmental performance; Social elements(expect) mainly positive influence social performance and environmental performance. On this basis, the relevant theory of sublimation, it is concluded that the latest social responsibility performance of 3 d model and influence.Based on the current research on corporate social responsibility in China and the research conclusion,this article from three aspects: companies, enterprises, social put forward to improve the performance of social responsibilities related policy proposals, to form effective governance mechanism of corporate social responsibility to promote the development of social responsibility. |
